Putin’s Smoking Gun: New Documents Reveal His Hand in the U.S. Election

Trump administration Vladimir Putin Donald Trump

Seven current and former U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed with Reuters the existence of two confidential documents obtained from a Russian government think tank controlled by Vladimir Putin. Those documents respectively reveal a plan to assist Donald Trump in winning the 2016 presidential election and a subsequent effort to undermine faith in the American electoral system.

Putin has long denied accusations of interference in the U.S. election, but the existence of these documents belies those denials.

The documents lie at the heart of U.S. intelligence conclusions that a concerted and intensive effort, using “fake news” and cyber attacks against Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic Party, was underway by Russia. The acquired documents provide a concise framework and rationale for the Kremlin’s covert actions. They had been prepared by the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies in Moscow, run by former senior Russian foreign intelligence officials handpicked by Putin’s office.

“Putin had the objective in mind all along, and he asked the institute to draw him a road map,” stated one of the sources, a former senior U.S. intelligence official.

The first document comprised a strategy paper, written last June. That document advised a Kremlin-backed social media campaign to spread propaganda so that U.S. voters would elect a president with a softer stance toward Russia than Obama had shown. The campaign included the use of Russian state-backed news outlets. Officials said the approach was a broadening of Kremlin efforts launched in March 2016. Moscow had instructed state-backed media outlets, including Russia Today and the Sputnik news agency, to begin positive reports on Trump. Many of these reports found their way into the blogosphere and to Twitter. Russia today produced one video that false stated all of Clinton’s charity collections went to them personally. That video accumulated over 10 million views.

The second document, written last October, assumed by that point that Hillary Clinton was going to win the election, and therefore advised that Russia end its pro-Trump propaganda and instead focus on messaging around widespread voter fraud in order to inflict maximum damage on the system and undermine Clinton’s credibility. Like the first document, the second document circulated among the highest levels of the Russian government.

While neither document mentioned the hacking of emails, which was an operation that U.S. officials believe was directed out of the Kremlin itself, both Russia Today and Sputnik heavily promoted news about the release of the hacked DNC emails, which often contained embarrassing details.

In a statement to Reuters, a spokesperson for Sputnik dismissed assertions by the U.S. officials that it participated in a Kremlin campaign as an "absolute pack of lies." The spokesperson went on to note, “And by the way, it's not the first pack of lies we're hearing from 'sources in U.S. official circles'."

Reuter’s sources declined to discuss how the United States obtained the documents, and U.S. intelligence agencies also declined to comment on them.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less