New York Wants to Limit Trump’s Pardon Powers and They Have a Plan to Do It

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 14: U.S. President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House before his departure to Walter Reed Medical Center on May 14, 2018 in Washington, DC. Trump is visiting first lady Melania Trump who is being treated for a kidney condition at the hospital. (Photo by Yuri Gripas-Pool/Getty Images)

President Trump’s administration continues to polarize government officials all over the country. On April 18th, New York’s Attorney General asked Governor Andrew Cuomo and state legislators for the power to ignore presidential pardons issued by Trump.

At that time, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman urged the governor and state legislative leaders to eliminate a standing loophole that exists in New York double jeopardy law. As it currently stands, the law shields individuals who have received presidential pardons from state prosecution. However, on May 7th, Schneidermann resigned as Attorney General, in response to four women accusing him of abuse.

In the wake of Robert Mueller's continued investigation of Trump, this law would make it extremely difficult for Trump aides—and other individuals implicated with Trump—to escape criminal prosecution. This change would still allow those individuals the possibility of prosecution, even if the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election produced no tangible results.

Although the president has no power to pardon perpetrators of state crimes, the current law means that individuals pardoned for federal crimes can be freed from culpability and “all accountability” under state laws.

Governor Cuomo reviewed Schneiderman’s proposal, while the state legislature introduced a bill that would enact the very change that Schneiderman proposed.

According to Cuomo’s Press Secretary, Cuomo “believes that the federal legal system should not provide a basis for any wrong doers to escape justice.”

“By closing New York’s double jeopardy loophole, lawmakers can ensure that no one accused of breaking New York’s laws will escape accountability merely because of a strategically-timed presidential pardon,” Schneiderman said in a statement. Changing the law would “substantially reduce the threat of lawless White House action.”

“We are disturbed by reports that the president is considering pardons of individuals who may have committed serious federal financial, tax, and other crimes — acts that may also violate New York law. We must ensure that if the president, or any president, issues such pardons, we can use the full force of New York’s laws to bring such individuals to justice,” Schneiderman said.

Schneiderman and Trump have a contentious history. The Attorney General led a three-year investigation against Trump University, which resulted in a $25 million judgment against the school. Trump had repeatedly attacked Schneiderman, calling him a “lightweight and total loser” on one occasion.


Legal experts believe that changing this law is of paramount importance. According to Jed Shugerman, a Fordham University law professor, the proposal would provide balance and gravitas. Changing the law would prevent harassment from prosecutors, while still “protects against pardons being used to obstruct justice.” Should this change be adopted, it would align New York with legal precedent already established in other states. Currently, 20 other states only provide the minimum legal protection required against double jeopardy.

Now that Schneidermann has resigned, the future of his actions to counter Trump has been brought into question. Currently, it is likely that the proposed legislation will continue to move forward in the short term. Beyond that is anyone's guess.

Barbara Underwood, New York’s Solicitor General, will immediately replace Schneidermann until the November midterm elections. Underwood is a Democrat and it is unlikely she will halt the actions that Schneidermann has already put into motion against Trump.

While it is unlikely that Underwood will reverse course, the ability of the legislation to quell Trump’s pardon abilities is decidedly less certain. In the past, Trump has promoted his presumed ability to pardon without restriction.

“While all agree the U.S. President has the complete power to pardon,” he tweeted last year. “Why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us.”

Trump even reportedly asked his aides if he could pardon himself.

At this time, the Trump has made no comment on Schneiderman’s actions or the proposed legislation. However, this hasn’t stopped members of Trump’s administration from responding to the scandal.


Keywords: Pardon, Trump, Double Jeopardy, Investigation, Politics

Summary: The New York Attorney General and state legislators are moving forward with efforts that will allow criminal changes to be brought against individuals who receive presidential pardons.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

President Donald Trump took the opportunity to hype his pet project—bollard fencing along the southern border—to a meeting of the National Border Patrol Council.

The NBPC—a union organization not part of the federal agency—is "the exclusive representative of approximately 18,000 Border Patrol Agents and support personnel assigned to the U.S. Border Patrol."

Keep reading...
Rich Polk/Getty Images for IMDb // Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Veteran actor and Democrat Alec Baldwin's portrayal of President Donald Trump on Saturday Night Live has garnered near-unanimous praise since the 2016 campaign (except, of course, from Trump himself).

But in a recent tweet, Baldwin reminded his followers that Trump's ascent and increasing corruption is no laughing matter.

Keep reading...
Fox Business

President Donald Trump's personal lawyer and one of the key players in the Ukraine scandal, Rudy Giuliani, is once again claiming to have proof of a Democratic scandal in Ukraine.

Once again, he's refusing to reveal it.

Keep reading...
Fox Business

Attorney General William Barr criticized President Donald Trump's tweets about Justice Department prosecutors' sentencing recommendation for Trump ally Roger Stone.

Barr—who overrode the recommendation after Trump railed against it on Twitter—said Trump's tweets made it impossible to do his job, though some people believe his words weren't to rein in Trump, but to mitigate public outrage.

Fox Host Lou Dobbs is not one of those people.

Keep reading...
Leah Millis-Pool/Getty Images // Chip Somodevilla/Getty Imageseditsharetrending_up

Americans across the country were furious when President Donald Trump fired Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman after Trump was acquitted in his impeachment trial by the Republican Senate.

Vindman complied with a congressional subpoena to testify before the House committee overseeing Trump's impeachment inquiry last year.

The career military official and Purple Heart recipient was escorted out by security along with his twin brother, an NSC official who played no part in the impeachment proceedings.

Keep reading...
ABC News

People cried foul earlier this week when the Justice Department overrode four career prosecutors to recommend a reduced sentence for former Trump campaign advisor Roger Stone.

The Department's decision came only a day after Trump railed against the prosecutors' recommendation on Twitter, leading many to believe the Department reduced the sentence recommendation because the President interceded on his ally's behalf.

All four prosecutors on the case resigned in response to the change.

Keep reading...