Donald Trump Just Announced He's Pulling Out of the Iran Deal and Iran Has Already Responded With a Threat

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 08: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a memorandum that reinstates sanctions on Iran after he announced his decision to withdraw the United States from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in the Diplomatic Room at the White House May 8, 2018 in Washington, DC. After two and a half years of negotiations, Iran agreed in 2015 to end its nuclear program in exchange for Western countries, including the United States, lifting decades of economic sanctions. Since then international inspectors have not found any violations of the terms by Iran. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump announced earlier today that the United States would exit the Iran nuclear deal.

"It is clear to me that we cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement," Trump said from the White House Diplomatic Room. "The Iran deal is defective at its core. If we do nothing we know exactly what will happen."


Trump had long campaigned against the nuclear deal and made exiting the agreement one of the signature pledges of his candidacy during the 2016 presidential election. He noted that any nation that helps Iran obtain nuclear weapons would also be "strongly sanctioned."

"This was a horrible one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made," the President said. "It didn't bring calm, it didn't bring peace, and it never will."

The president had earlier criticized the deal as one of the Obama administration's "worst" decisions, and in his statements, he expressed his belief that the deal served to benefit the Iranian regime while sponsoring terrorism.

"At the point when the US had maximum leverage, this disastrous deal gave this regime -- and it's a regime of great terror -- many billions of dollars, some of it in actually cash -- a great embarrassment to me as a citizen," Trump said.

It didn't take long for Tehran to respond. The Associated Press reports that the Iranian president said that should negotiations fail, "the Islamic Republic will enrich uranium 'more than before ... in next weeks."

The president's move earned a harsh rebuke from numerous political figures, particularly those who helped negotiate the deal.

Ending the United States's participation in the nuclear deal "will have a devastatingly chilling effect on any kind of economic activity" between Europe and Iran," said Tony Blinken, former deputy secretary of State under former president Barack Obama.

Robert Einhorn, a former arms control official at State under Obama's first Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, observed that it will take time to redevelop the "regulatory scheme" required should the United States decide to reimpose sanctions.

The practical effect of exiting the deal is to notify banks, busineses, and purchasers of Iranian crude oil "that in the next 180 days, before November, they have to either stop importing Iranian crude oil or make significant reductions, up to 20% of Iranian crude oil," Einhorn said.

Marie Harf, a political commentator for Fox News who worked as the Senior Advisor of Strategic Communications to former Secretary of State John Kerry and led the Iran nuclear negotiations communications strategy, criticized the president's move, observing that "saying it [that the United States will exit the deal] doesn't just make it so."

Harf noted, in particular, that the president only condemned the deal, and never offered a course of action going forward:

I thought what was interesting was that Donald Trump said a lot about what he didn't like in the deal. He said a lot about how bad Iran's behavior is, and he said very little about what comes next, and how he will actually work to fix the deal, whether he has a comprehensive plan in place, and he almost made an implicit military threat when he said, 'If Iran moves in a direction we don't want them to, they will face a problem like they've never seen before.'

So for a lot of us, the question facing the president today wasn't whether or not we should have done the deal originally. We know how he feels about that. It's what the best course is moving forward, and if tomorrow Iran kicks out the inspectors, if they restart their enrichment because now we have made the deal null and void, what will Donald Trump do? We did not hear details about how he will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon going forward, and I think it's incumbent upon him and his administration now to lay out their case for how they will do that.

Proponents of exiting the agreement have cited weaknesses that the leaders of France, Germany and Britain themselves have acknowledged and pledged to improve. These include:

  • eliminating expiration dates on vital restrictions on Iran's nuclear activity, allowing Iran to resume large-scale processing of nuclear fuel starting in 2025
  • allowing inspections of military sites, which Iran currently prohibits
  • limiting Iran's ballistic missile program
  • addressing Iran's support for terrorist groups across the Middle East

French President Emmanuel Macron met with President Trump last month and urged Congress to not only stay in the deal, but seek to improve it. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, in separate meetings with the president, also urged him to keep the deal, agreeing with the assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that the deal limits Iran's nuclear capabilities for now and that Iran has always complied.

Michael Reynolds - Pool/Getty Images

Since the start of his campaign, President Donald Trump's support among Black voters has remained pitifully low.

Despite claims that he's the "least racist person" alive, Trump told four Congresswomen of color to "go back" where they came from, defended unapologetic white supremacists, put forth racist immigration policies, and currently employs at least one white nationalist in the White House—and that's just during his presidency.

Keep reading...
Alex Wong/Getty Images // Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images

Since her upset primary victory in the summer of 2018, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and her progressive agenda have become a favorite target of the Right wing.

The party that claims to champion people who "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" often derides Ocasio-Cortez's former career as a bartender in Manhattan—a position she took after college when her father's death put her family in dire financial straits.

Keep reading...
Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Two months after it emerged in Wuhan, China, the coronavirus has spread throughout Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, North America, and sub-Saharan Africa with nearly 84,000 cases worldwide.

The United States is scrambling to prepare for an outbreak that officials have deemed inevitable—but President Donald Trump and his staff are saying the concern is overblown.

Keep reading...
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

All too often, words seem insufficient to describe the latest scandal or atrocity from the administration of President Donald Trump.

That's usually when The New Yorker steps in.

Famous for its headline-free covers, illustrators have perfectly captured the administration's mob-like tendencies or the subservience of once respected Senators to Trump's every whim.

Keep reading...
Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The State Department is responsible for not only foreign relations and embassy operations outside the USA, they also take care of United States citizens and permanent residents when they work and travel in foreign nations.

In response to natural disaster, political unrest or pandemics, the State Department does whatever necessary to safely evacuate USA citizens and residents while mitigating any risks to the rest of the population of the country.

At least that's what is supposed to happen.

Keep reading...
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Despite the growing threat of the rapidly-spreading coronavirus, President Donald Trump has taken repeated steps to dismiss the need for widespread drastic action to contain an outbreak in the United States that experts have deemed inevitable.

But how could a President possibly benefit from being cavalier about a pandemic?

Keep reading...