Democratic Senator's Surprisingly Blunt Assessment of the Curtailed FBI Investigation Into Brett Kavanaugh Is Pretty Much All of Us

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 24: Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) delivers opening remarks during a hearing with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill May 24, 2018 in Washington, DC. Originally scheduled to focus on the FY2019 budget, the hearing was sidetracked by Trump's announcement that the United States is pulling out of the planned summit with North Korea. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Asked for his thoughts on the official report from the FBI regarding its time-limited investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Senator Robert "Bob" Menendez (D-NJ) was as direct as he could be.

"If that's an investigation, it's a bullshit investigation," he said. "The reality is that is not a full and thorough investigation. Evidently, the Republicans who gave the direction to the FBI of what could be investigated was extremely limited."

"You don't, you know, I hear a lot about a lack of corroboration and you don't get corroborating information if you don't talk to corroborating witnesses and that obviously didn't happen here," he continued. "And so I'm amazed, I'm amazed for the highest court in the land that this is the type of report the FBI produces."

Menendez knows a thing or two about FBI investigations: In 2015, he pleaded not guilty to federal corruption charges related to alleged favors he did for a Florida ophthalmologist and the gifts he received from him in return. (The charges against him were later dropped by the Justice Department.)

That hasn't stopped many from agreeing with his assessment, considering the enormous amount of pushback the FBI's report has received from politicians and the general public alike in light of the limits placed upon the investigation and the knowledge that the bureau declined to interview the witnesses suggested by the attorneys for Kavanaugh's accusers.

Democrats have heavily criticized the FBI investigation, calling it a "sham" and "a horrific cover-up."

"The whole thing is sham. Five days to do the investigation," said Senator Tim Kaine (VA), who noted that many witnesses had not been interviewed.

Referring to a secure location where senators can read the report for a limited amount of time, he said: "And so, here is what they do. There is now a report. One copy. Only one copy that's available in the Senate SCIF. So they don't want 100 senators to read it. I'm not allowed to discuss it. The public can't see it. It's a complete sham."

"It's obviously a cover-up," said his colleague Ed Markey (MA). "The Trump White House, working with the Republican leadership in the Senate, have deliberately circumscribed this investigation."

After reading the report, Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA), the leading Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee,  claimed that the investigation was “incomplete.”

“What we reviewed today ... it looks to be a product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White House,” she said.

She also took to Twitter to say that Democrats' "previous concerns about Judge Kavanaugh's truthfulness have also not been assuaged by this investigation" and reiterated that it is "impossible" to take the investigation seriously when so many corroborating witnesses were not interviewed.

The White House is increasingly certain that Kavanaugh will be confirmed now that several Republican senators crucial to the final vote have expressed satisfaction with the findings of the FBI investigation.

Kavanugh's fate falls to a small group of undecided Republican senators.

According to Senator Susan Collins (ME), “it appears to be a very thorough investigation, but I’m going back later to personally read the interviews.”

Senator Jeff Flake (AZ), who requested the investigation and delayed the vote following both Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford’s testimonies before the Senate Judiciary Committee, told reporters that “we’ve seen no additional corroborating information.”

By contrast, Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK), per one report, said “that she did not yet know whether the FBI had been thorough enough in its investigation or spoken to enough witnesses.”

The Washington Post reported that the FBI's investigation had been "highly curtailed" and that it had focused primarily on the allegations brought to light by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week recalled when Kavanaugh assaulted her during a high school party. The FBI did not interview Dr. Ford, deeming her Senate testimony sufficient.

The FBI did interview Deborah Ramirez, who says Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a Yale fraternity party, but Ramirez's legal team has no indication that the FBI interviewed any of the corroborating witnesses they provided. Nor did the bureau interview Julie Swetnick, who says Kavanaugh was present at a house party in 1982 where she alleges she was the victim of a gang rape,

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less