SECONDNEXUS
percolately
georgetakei
comicsands
George's Readscapital gains
Top stories
After Canceling Federal Employee Pay Raises, Donald Trump Is Considering a Huge New Giveaway to the Wealthy
Seriously?
Yesterday it was announced that President Donald Trump would be canceling planned pay increases for millions of federal employees.
NEWS: President Trump says he's eliminating a pay raise for civilian federal employees slated for 2019 in order to… https://t.co/V3zBPw8qXq— Sahil Kapur (@Sahil Kapur) 1535647492.0
The reason he stated:
"To put our nation on a fiscally sustainable course."
But now it appears that even as he was signing this order, he was touting a policy change he's considering that would primarily benefit the wealthiest one percent in the United States.
In an interview with Bloomberg, the president confirmed that he's weighing the possibility of indexing capital gains taxes according to inflation. The move would result in an additional 100 billion dollars to the rich.
BLOOMBERG: Do you favor the idea of indexing capital gains?TRUMP: I’m thinking about it. I’m thinking about it...I’m thinking about it very strongly.
I’m also thinking about going, as you know, to a -- to a half-time instead of a quarter-time for reporting and guidance.
BLOOMBERG: Yeah, any closer on that, on making a decision?
TRUMP: I’ve asked Jay Clayton to look at it very strongly. He’s looking at it. I like the concept, but I’ll -- I’ll be relying -- the only one that will be fighting us on that will be the accountants.
Assets typically gain value over time, therefore many make the case that taxing investment gains without adjusting for inflation cheats investors out of a growth in value that isn't profit or value based, but simply inevitable growth due to inflation.
The policy would exacerbate the already rampant wealth inequality in the United States.
Many Americans are saying that the move only benefits the rich and does nothing to boost the economy.
Dynamic scoring by the Penn Wharton Budget Model dynamically finds zero economic boost from indexing capital gains… https://t.co/Ky3RdYZeZP— Jim Tankersley (@Jim Tankersley) 1534863143.0
@elwasson No one can claim that Trump is not a Master of Timing. This is positively 3rd dimensional chess type bril… https://t.co/9dIFzYVVbN— Terry Hannan (@Terry Hannan) 1535664889.0
When a massive tax cut for the rich just isn't enough! Trump says he's considering reducing capital gains taxes https://t.co/pXVDEvGj4c— Jack Christensen (@Jack Christensen) 1535725676.0
Trump says that he's considering making the move through executive order, however, it doesn't seem like he actually has the ability to do that.
In 1992, George H.W. Bush's treasury department and department of justice found that the president cannot unilaterally instruct the Department of the Treasury to index capital gains according to inflation.
Trump gave an interview to Bloomberg yesterday in which he said he was considering indexing capital gains for infla… https://t.co/H922Yb5T0L— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1535727198.0
Law professors Daniel Hemel and David Kamin reached the same conclusion in the Yale Journal on Regulation:
"the legal authority for presidential indexation simply does not exist. The Justice Department under the first President Bush reached the conclusion in 1992 that the Executive Branch cannot implement inflation indexing unilaterally, and doctrinal developments in the last quarter century have—if anything—strengthened that conclusion."
Hemel and Kamin also note that indexation would not bolster the economy in the way that many of its supporters claim.
"whatever the merits of comprehensive legislation that adjusts the taxation of capital gains and various other elements of the Internal Revenue Code for inflation, rifle-shot regulatory action that targets only the capital gains tax would be costly and regressive, and would open a number of large loopholes that allow for rampant tax arbitrage."
Americans are pointing out that indexing according to inflation does nothing to help the average worker and does plenty to hurt them.
Fiscal austerity is not necessary or politically feasible, but going forward, politicians should not make matters w… https://t.co/E0LglIN1jz— Jennifer Rubin (@Jennifer Rubin) 1533922087.0
The capitalists are about to fall all over themselves to give yet another tax break to themselves, this time allowi… https://t.co/uN23s42mUy— NeoTrotsky For The 21st Century (@NeoTrotsky For The 21st Century) 1533042710.0
@nytimes So the coal miner in West Virginia or the steel worker in Pennsylvania voted for Trump to index capital ga… https://t.co/KMXCoe4mGP— JoeCuban (@JoeCuban) 1532985533.0
The move doesn't necessarily come as a surprise, given the slashing of corporate tax rates in this administrations tax deal that mainly benefit the rich. Many aren't surprised that, once again, Trump seems to be looking out for number one.