Trump Promised to Release the Transcript of the 'More Important' Call With Ukraine, and He Is Getting So Roasted

President Donald J. Trump in the East Room of the White House on Wednesday, Oct 30, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

With the first rounds of public impeachment hearings set to start on Wednesday, President Donald Trump is scrambling to discredit the entire process.

Ignoring the numerous State Department, Pentagon, and White House officials who acknowledged the existence of a quid pro quo given by the Trump administration to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump promised to release the first "and therefore more important" transcript of a call with Zelensky that occurred prior to the pair's July 25 call, which spurred the impeachment inquiry in the first place.

He promised to do so before the week is out.

It was a whistleblower complaint asserting that Trump urged Zelensky to investigate his potential 2020 opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden which led to initial scrutiny of Trump's business dealings with Ukraine. However, depositions in the impeachment inquiry have gone on to reveal that the Trump administration withheld crucial congressionally-approved military aid to Ukraine in exchange for a public announcement of an investigation

In other words, the Zelensky call is hardly the only evidence of corruption in the administration's dealings with Ukraine.

It's unclear why Trump believes the earlier call will somehow vindicate him—or why he has to wait so long to produce it.

The White House released a rough summary of the July 25 call the day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced an impeachment inquiry into the President. Trump and his administration have called it a transcript, but the word-for-word transcript was moved to a classified computer network.

People are far more interested in the contents of that conversation, which the White House has yet to release.

Americans across the country will be tuning in to see the first public testimonies in the inquiry tomorrow. Trump's transcript will have to be a doozie to distract from that.


Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less
gbuck_jr/Twitter; National Archives

The Republican Party again raised ire and eyebrows with yet another GOP candidate advocating violence against members of Congress in official campaign materials.

This time it is George Buck Jr. of Florida. The GOP politician is running for the 13th congressional district—a seat currently held by Democrat Charlie Crist.

Keep reading... Show less
Win McNamee/Getty Images // Hogan Gidley/Twitter

President Donald Trump's press team is working overtime to discredit media coverage of the impeachment hearings against their boss.

The House Judiciary Committee began its hearings today, with four constitutional scholars—Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman, and Jonathan Turley—tasked with testifying about the constitutionality of impeaching Donald Trump. The former three were invited by Democrats, who hold the majority, while Turley was invited by Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less

The House Intelligence Committee submitted to the House Judiciary Committee its 300 page report of information gleaned from fact witnesses so far in the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

In addition to reiterating the testimony of several witnesses regarding Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine, the report also highlighted call records between numerous key players in the Ukraine scandal.

Keep reading... Show less