We Now Know How Saudi Arabia Plans to Explain the Death of Jamal Khashoggi, and People Have Serious Questions

In a starting development from The New York Times, leaders from Saudi Arabia are preparing a report announcing that dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi died while in custody of the Saudi government.

On October 2, a day before his wedding, Khashoggi was seen on video walking into the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to retrieve a document finalizing the dissolution of his previous marriage. That was the last time he was seen and there is no footage of him leaving the consulate, though--until now--Saudi officials said he had left safely. Many are concerned that he was ordered dead by the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, of whom Khashoggi was an immense critic.

After a conversation with Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, President Donald Trump suggested that "rogue killers" could be responsible, rather than Saudi officials:

"The king firmly denied any knowledge of it. He didn't really know, maybe - I don't want to get into his mind but it sounded to me - maybe these could have been rogue killers. Who knows?"

This narrative seemed to match the one Saudi leaders planput forth, according to the Times:

But he said the royal court would soon put out a narrative that an official within the kingdom’s intelligence services — who happened to be a friend of Prince Mohammed — had carried out the killing. The person said Prince Mohammed had approved an interrogation or rendition of Mr. Khashoggi back to Saudi Arabia. But, he said, the Saudi intelligence official was tragically incompetent as he eagerly sought to prove himself in secretive operations.

Essentially, Saudi leaders are planning to say that a Saudi official got carried away and murdered Khashoggi in his devotion to Prince Mohammed, or rather the official went rogue.

But many Americans are dismissing this as a possibility.

Some are also suspicious at the similarity of the two statements.One of those who isn't buying the Saudi government's explanation is Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) who serves on the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Others think the two statements might have been in cahoots.

The President's relationship with Saudi Arabia has been under intense scrutiny after Khashoggi's disappearance. Trump's businesses have enjoyed millions of dollars of revenue from the wallets of Saudi officials, with Trump saying at a campaign rally in 2015:

"I get along great with all of them.They buy apartments from me. They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much!"

Many have assumed that Trump's lack of action in regards to Khashoggi's disappearance may have something to do with these business connections.

Americans won't know more until the report is complete, but the whispers are foreboding for Khashoggi, journalism, and Americans.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less