Fox Business co-host Dagen McDowell criticized President Donald Trump for ballooning the national deficit, suggesting on today's broadcast of Fox News's "Outnumbered" that the United States should stop borrowing money from the Chinese.
“If President Trump and this is administration want to get tough with China, then stop spending so much borrowed money," she said. “Because we are borrowing from China. They are one of the two biggest foreign holders of our U.S. Data. We are running budget deficits back near the $1 trillion mark.”
"Outnumbered" host Harris Faulkner responded that the economy would need to be "restructured" for McDowell's recommendation to work. "We couldn’t do that even with Republicans, bicamerally in control over the last year up until the midterms of 2016," he told her. “It is swamp-what up in there.”
McDowell agreed, referring to Trump as a "swamp denizen."
“Again, now he’s a swamp denizen, I suppose. President Trump has been spending money had overfished just like every of the president going back to, well, Reagan."
You can watch the exchange below:
McDowell's criticisms came after the president claimed in a tweet that the United States "has been losing, for many years, 600 to 800 Billion Dollars a year on Trade."
The United States has been losing, for many years, 600 to 800 Billion Dollars a year on Trade. With China we lose 5… https://t.co/CbOQdXGO37— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump)1557140921.0
The president's understanding––or lack thereof––of trade deficits was scrutinized.
@realDonaldTrump We don’t spend money “on trade.” We buy things with this money, but we sell China less. It is call… https://t.co/fquv177lJs— Hussain Abdul-Hussain 🇺🇸 (@Hussain Abdul-Hussain 🇺🇸)1557141172.0
@realDonaldTrump Spending. We spent that money. Individuals and companies, not the country as a whole. The things w… https://t.co/syC1kXUcQp— Alexandra Erin (@Alexandra Erin)1557148927.0
@realDonaldTrump "Trade deficits" aren't actually deficits. We don't owe money. We aren't losing money. As the weal… https://t.co/wfNp5GXAAk— Alexandra Erin (@Alexandra Erin)1557149067.0
@realDonaldTrump My cat has a better understanding of trade then you do. You really should call Wharton and get your money back.— Janet Johnson (@Janet Johnson)1557147457.0
Over the weekend, Trump said that tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods will increase to 25 percent on Friday, up from 10 percent.
For 10 months, China has been paying Tariffs to the USA of 25% on 50 Billion Dollars of High Tech, and 10% on 200 B… https://t.co/oXh0NKws5m— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump)1557072526.0
....of additional goods sent to us by China remain untaxed, but will be shortly, at a rate of 25%. The Tariffs paid… https://t.co/TXwRRmoyVO— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump)1557072526.0
Last year, the president's understanding of trade (and tariffs) was similarly criticized when he made a bizarre claim about tariffs and how they operate.
“Tariffs are the greatest!” the president claimed, before saying that leveling tariffs are a “simple” repercussion of negotiating trade deals that would impact the United States “unfairly.”
Tariffs are the greatest! Either a country which has treated the United States unfairly on Trade negotiates a fair… https://t.co/iYLwdq5W9g— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump)1532431790.0
Tariffs are taxes on imports or exports between sovereign states. In the United States, many tariffs are paid at the time of entry into the country via a U.S. customs broker or agent, and that doesn’t necessarily account for duties and fees that may apply to the import.
Trump’s tweet came as the U.S. and China sparred tensely after Trump announced an additional $200 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods, in an attempt to get businesses to use less Chinese-produced goods and opt for goods made in the U.S. or by allies with whom the country has less precarious trade relationships.
These tariffs don’t benefit the U.S. or, as Trump puts it, “the piggy bank that’s being robbed.” The tariffs actually result in production cost increases for businesses that use imported Chinese products. These increases happen because businesses either must use more expensive domestic parts or pay more for the finished products.
Trump’s tariffs also focus on intermediary goods, or parts, which many small-to-medium-sized U.S. businesses use to make finished products. Consequently, the increased cost of parts places businesses into positions where they must either raise prices on their goods and pass the cost on to the consumer, reduce their workforce, or shutter U.S. operations and move overseas to avoid tariffs.