[DIGEST: HuffingtonPost, Eastbay Times, Scientific American, CDC, Reuters, Psychiatriki, CDPH, Neurotoxicology ]

Sacramento resident Sandra Levario said her grandson loved to play in her backyard as a toddler. Levario’s house lies in the shadow of a now-shuttered gun range. Despite its closure in 2014 and the fact that toxic levels of lead dust had coated nearly every surface of the building for years, the public was not informed of the lead hazard. But after her grandson developed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Levario suspected a connection to lead poisoning. “Now I won’t let my grandkids even play in the yard.”

California is undergoing a different lead crisis than Flint, Michigan. In some cases, the lead in children’s blood is two or three times as high as found in Flint. While Flint’s well-publicized problem came from water traveling through lead pipes, California’s problem is harder to find and fix because much of the lead poisoning comes from legacy lead or contamination left over from the past— lead paint, leaded gasoline, industrial waste and even neighborhood gun ranges. This lead is in the soil in school playgrounds, on the walls of apartment buildings, in parks and vacant lots where children play baseball and in the air. And people don’t want to talk about it.

Credit: Source.

In one downtown Fresno zip code, 93701, nearly 14 percent of children younger than six years old had lead levels at or above five micrograms per deciliter of blood, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s current threshold for an elevated reading. Contrast this with Flint's recent crisis, where only five percent of children tested above the five microgram level for lead. In all, the Reuters' report found at least 29 Golden State neighborhoods where children had elevated lead levels. In Humboldt County where 303 children were tested, more than 10 percent showed high lead levels, according to the 2012 California Department of Public Health (CDPH) study.

In the 90011 zip code of Los Angeles, where a three-bedroom home goes for under $245,000, over five percent of children under six showed lead poisoning levels of 210 mcg/dL. In a neighboring district of Los Angeles, houses in zip code 90703, where a cheaper three bedroom home might cost $585,000, lead levels were above 1 mcg/dL in only 0.22 percent of children tested. But it is not all about the wealth. In the 92253 area of Riverside, California, where zero out of 353 children tested found positive for high lead levels, a three bedroom home can be had for under $160,000.

California does not require lead testing. So there is limited or no state data on lead levels in children in many California neighborhoods, including some of California's most expensive neighborhoods which include: 94027 – Atherton, 94062 – Woodside, 91302 – Hidden Hills, 94010 – Hillsborough, 94022 – Los Altos Hills, 94920 – Belvedere, 90210 – Beverly Hills, and 90402 – Santa Monica. Yet, the CDPH has known about the elevated levels for five years.

“The challenge is collecting the data and having the children tested in order to determine how dangerous the situation is.” Larry Brooks, director of operations for the Alameda County Healthy Homes Department added that residents are reluctant to report the hazards, fearing landlords might retaliate.

Lead has been banned from gasoline, paint and water pipes yet still exists in urban areas, in houses painted earlier than 1978 and around lead mines. "Prevention should be the single most important way of dealing with lead poisoning," said Maria Samakouri, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Democritus University of Thrace and the University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Lead can also be found in certain home remedies, imported pottery, candy, spices and cosmetics, according to the California Department of Public Health. Lead damages the brain, nerves, red blood cells, kidneys and reproductive systems. Lead can also cause high blood pressure and miscarriages because it easily crosses the placenta in a pregnant woman. Children who are exposed to lead may have problems learning and paying attention. Damage from lead exposure can be permanent.

The only way to know if there is lead in your body is to have a blood lead test. One- and two-year old children should be tested. The main treatment for lead poisoning is to remove the person from the place where they were exposed and allow the body to clear the lead.

Lead poisoning affects brain cells, nerve receptors and brain chemistry including dopamine levels (affected in Parkinson's disease), acetylcholine (affected in Myasthenia gravis and Alzheimer's disease) and glutamate (implicated in autism, antisocial behavior, schizophrenia, attention deficit disorder, and periventricular leukomalacia—injury to the white matter of the brain).

Early symptoms of lead poisoning and its effect on the brain are irritability, headaches and concentration issues in both children and adults. Continuous exposure in children may result in the inability to follow instructions, difficulty playing games and low IQ. The most common symptom in adults is peripheral neuropathy (nerve pain and damage) with foot drop or the inability to lift the toes when walking.

CDC recommended lead poisoning prevention methods include removing layers of paint from before 1978 that may contain lead, exercising caution when renovating older homes, drinking only cold tap water since hot water can leach more lead from lead water pipes, and administering blood tests to children under six  if there is a chance they are being exposed to lead.

Shannon Finney/Getty Images

Across the country, states have instituted stay-at-home orders in an effort to curb the spread of the highly contagious virus that's upended daily life in the United States.

Late last month, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers issued one of these orders, urging his constituents to only leave their houses for necessary errands, such as getting groceries or filling prescriptions.

There's just one problem: Wisconsin's elections are scheduled for April 7. In addition to the Presidential primaries, Wisconsinites will vote for judicial positions, school board seats, and thousands of other offices.

The Democratic and Republican National Committees took the case to the Supreme Court, with Democrats arguing that the deadline for mailing absentee ballots should be extended by a week, to April 13, in order to facilitate voting from home.

With a Wisconsin Supreme Court Seat up for grabs on Tuesday, Republicans predictably made the case for why as few people as possible should be permitted to vote. It was a continuation of Wisconsin GOP efforts to suppress the vote, which included rejecting a demand from Governor Evers to automatically mail an absentee ballot to every resident.

The Republican majority in United States Supreme Court sided with the RNC and the election in Wisconsin will carry on as scheduled. This is despite Wisconsin being unprepared for the surge in absentee ballot requests, which leapt from a typical 250,000 to over 1.2 million in reaction to the virus. Thousands of these voters won't even receive these ballots until after the election, thereby preventing them from exercising their right to vote.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a blistering dissent to the majority's decision, saying:

"Either [voters] will have to brave the polls, endangering their own and others' safety. Or they will lose their right to vote, through no fault of their own. That is a matter of utmost importance — to the constitutional rights of Wisconsin's citizens, the integrity of the State's election process, and in this most extraordinary time, the health of the Nation."

She was flabbergasted that her more conservative colleagues didn't think a global pandemic and national crisis was enough to justify emergency policies ensuring Wisconsinites their right to vote:

"The Court's suggestion that the current situation is not 'substantially different' from 'an ordinary
election' boggles the mind...Now, under this Court's order, tens of thousands of absentee voters, unlikely to receive their ballots in time to cast them, will be left quite literally without a vote."

A majority of the Supreme Court may not have agreed with Ginsburg, but the court of public opinion was fully on her side.

The Republican efforts indicated to some that the party cares more about maintaining control than preserving lives.

Large crowds are already gathering in Wisconsin to vote.

In a bit of devastating irony, the Supreme Court voted remotely when making its decision.

For more information about the tried and true tactic of GOP voter suppression, check out Uncounted, available here.

JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Despite numerous cautions from medical experts—including those on his staff—President Donald Trump continues to tout hydroxychloroquine as a promising treatment for the virus that's brought daily life in the United States to a standstill.

The drug has undergone no clinical trials to scientifically test its efficacy on the virus, and the evidence on its behalf is anecdotal at best. One Fox News guest, Access Health International Chairman William Haseltine, called it a "quack cure."

Keep reading... Show less
Catherine Nance / Echoes Wire/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, is back in the public eye after keeping a relatively low profile following the impeachment trial against his client.

Keep reading... Show less
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images // Mark Wilson/Getty Images

With the global pandemic bringing daily life in the United States to a screeching halt, the 2020 campaign has become somewhat of an afterthought as Americans focus on staying healthy and practicing social distancing.

But though the campaign trail is no longer in full swing, voters across the country can't help but see this crisis as a test of competence for President Donald Trump and a test of leadership for former Vice President and likely Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Keep reading... Show less
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images // Samuel Corum/Getty Images

A recent in-depth report from the Washington Post detailed the 70 day period between President Donald Trump's first knowledge of the virus and his eventual acknowledgment that the pandemic—which has killed over 10,000 people in the United States—poses a serious threat.

Trump's constant dismissal of the virus wasn't for lack of experts and longtime lawmakers warning him of the possibilities, as Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent points out.

Keep reading... Show less
JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Author and military historian Max Boot is a self-identified conservative, but he's by no means a supporter of President Donald Trump. Boot endorsed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election and he's frequently referred to Trump as the worst President in modern times.

But in a blistering new op-ed for the Washington Post, Boot removes the "in modern times" qualifier, referring to Trump as simply the worst President in U.S. history, citing his delayed and inadequate response to the virus that's brought the United States to a standstill.

Keep reading... Show less