oh-myyy-ribbon

House Democrats Are Planning to Go After Donald Trump's Tax Returns, and Their Plan Starts Next Week

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 01: U.S. President Donald Trump participates in a meeting with leaders of the steel industry at the White House March 1, 2018 in Washington, DC. Trump announced planned tariffs on imported steel and aluminum during the meeting, with details to be released at a later date. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Democrats in the House of Representatives announced on Thursday that President Donald Trump's tax returns will be the subject of a hearing scheduled two days after he gives his State of the Union address.

Vice President Mike Pence's tax returns will also be a subject of the hearing.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) invited Trump to give the annual speech on the floor of the House on Tuesday, February 5.

On Thursday, February 7, the House Ways and Means Oversight Committee, chaired by Congressman John Lewis (D-GA), will hold a hearing to assess whether they have the Constitutional authority to obtain the president's financials.

The power to request the documents lies solely with House Tax Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA), who has advocated a heedful approach to poking at Trump's finances.

“The president has repeatedly said on the campaign trail and then after becoming president, he intended to do this, to release them, except that he was under audit,” Neal said Tuesday. “So that’s the basis we proceed on. He added that if Trump does not agree to a "voluntary submission, then we use the legal apparatus that’s available to us.”

Technically, all Neal has to do is send a request to the IRS. But Democrats are charting a slower course, rather than issuing a subpoena, to avoid possible legal entanglements and Republican complaints about possible overreach.

Some members of the Democratic House caucus would rather seek forgiveness than permission.

“The law is very clear that we’re entitled to get those returns,” Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), who also sits on Ways and Means, said Thursday. “If the Treasury secretary... refuses to do it, then we will have to take some court action."

Either way, expect a fight from Trump and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

As promised though, Democrats are finally going after Trump's tax returns.

Trump famously reneged on his promise to release his tax returns as a presidential candidate, becoming the first White House hopeful in 40 years to refuse to make their tax returns public.

At the time, Trump's excuse was that he was under audit, though the IRS said one has nothing to do with the other.

People are demanding change.

Trump's string of bankruptcies in the 1980s and 1990s, which was followed by a period of cash influxes from foreign interests such as Russia and entities like Deutsche Bank, add to the speculation that Trump is hiding something.

The public's interest in Trump's tax returns was rekindled last October in the wake of a bombshell New York Times report - their longest ever - which outlined decades of financial fraud and tax evasion by Trump, his businesses, and his family.

Trump "received at least $413 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real estate empire, much of it through tax dodges in the 1990s," the Times found.

Next week's hearing will also include legislation to make it mandatory for presidential candidates to release 10 years of tax returns to the public within 15 days of winning their party's nomination.

Shortly before Trump's inauguration, Representative Anna Eshoo (D-CA) introduced the Presidential Tax Transparency Act to do just that. Congressman Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) was one of the dozens of co-sponsors.

“Before 2016, presidential candidates routinely disclosed their tax returns,” Pascrell and Eshoo said in a statement. “Donald Trump refused to clear that low bar, and as a result, the American people remain in the dark about the extent of his financial entanglements and potential conflicts of interest.”

Eshoo's proposal has companion legislation in the Senate put forth by Ron Wyden (D-OR).

Similar bills have been proposed in at least 25 states.

CNN

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less
gbuck_jr/Twitter; National Archives

The Republican Party again raised ire and eyebrows with yet another GOP candidate advocating violence against members of Congress in official campaign materials.

This time it is George Buck Jr. of Florida. The GOP politician is running for the 13th congressional district—a seat currently held by Democrat Charlie Crist.

Keep reading... Show less
Win McNamee/Getty Images // Hogan Gidley/Twitter

President Donald Trump's press team is working overtime to discredit media coverage of the impeachment hearings against their boss.

The House Judiciary Committee began its hearings today, with four constitutional scholars—Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman, and Jonathan Turley—tasked with testifying about the constitutionality of impeaching Donald Trump. The former three were invited by Democrats, who hold the majority, while Turley was invited by Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less
@atrupar/Twitter

The House Intelligence Committee submitted to the House Judiciary Committee its 300 page report of information gleaned from fact witnesses so far in the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

In addition to reiterating the testimony of several witnesses regarding Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine, the report also highlighted call records between numerous key players in the Ukraine scandal.

Keep reading... Show less