Ivanka and Jared Used Personal Accounts to Do Government Business, and Now House Dems Are Going After Those Messages
Federal government officials with security clearances are expected to practice vigilance with their official files, records and correspondence. But since taking office, President Donald Trump's administration has been cited repeatedly for using personal devices, servers and commercial apps for official government business while failing to forward the correspondence to official email.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was cited for using a personal email server, but did comply with the legal requirement to forward messages which cleared her of violating federal law. But "lock her up" and Clinton's emails remain a talking point for Trump supporters years after the presidential campaign.
The House Oversight Committee voted Thursday to subpoena White House records including two top White House advisers, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner. Both have participated not just as advisers to the President but also in meetings and negotiations with foreign governments.
Ivanka recently received criticism for her insertion into the G20 Summit. Jared Kushner's assignment to broker a Middle East peace plan also drew public ire.
All White House officials are subject to the subpoena the House committee voted to authorize Thursday. But much of the emphasis is on Ivanka Trump using her private email and Kushner's use of WhatsApp for discussions with world leaders.
House Oversight Committee Chairman, Democrat Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland said:
"I don’t know how to say this any differently: We have laws. And the laws say we keep official records."
Democrats raised concerns over a year ago that practices in the Trump White House violate the Presidential Records Act.
"It makes clear that White House records belong to the public—not the president."
The committee asked the White House to voluntarily turn over the records, but they refused which lead to Thursday's vote.
"The committee has already received evidence of multiple senior officials using their personal accounts to conduct official business."
"[The Oversight Committee] has obtained direct evidence that multiple high-level White House officials have been violating the Presidential Records Act. . . . What we do not yet know is why these White House officials were attempting to conceal these communications."
The vote authorized a subpoena for "all communications sent or received since President Donald Trump took office that were not forwarded to official email accounts within 20 days, as required by law, including text messages, phone-based message applications, or encryption software.”
The committee can also subpoena information regarding the presence of classified information in the unsecured and unforwarded messages. The House resolution specifically mentions acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney who also serves as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
While the investigation actually began in 2017 when Republicans controlled the House and the Oversight Committee, Thursday's vote was split along party lines as evidenced by the Twitter posts by each side of the aisle.
NEWS ALERT: Committee approved subpoena to #WhiteHouse for emails sent on personal accounts in violation of federal… https://t.co/0ECNUedxmL— Oversight Committee (@Oversight Committee) 1564073780.0
Yesterday, Democrats had #Mueller testify. It was a total bust. Today, @OversightDems are going after the emails… https://t.co/7bPMHhCavD— Oversight Committee Republicans (@Oversight Committee Republicans) 1564066548.0
The hearing was contentious.
Rep. Chip Roy walked out of the House Oversight hearing this morning after Rep. Gerald Connolly pushed back on his… https://t.co/cCon04B0GN— CSPAN (@CSPAN) 1564076788.0
@cspan No offense but the committee was better off without him— MilkPublius (@MilkPublius) 1564076943.0
@cspan lol this dude whines about the debt, blocks disaster relief bills, then goes ahead and votes for tax cuts fo… https://t.co/937xyNCEpi— Brendel (@Brendel) 1564077726.0
@cspan Should be noted that Chip Roy, an archetype Texas "conservative" (Perry/Paxton/Cruz) only won TX 21 by 2% ov… https://t.co/1MoLY30Cz6— MaterialMat[REDACTED] (@MaterialMat[REDACTED]) 1564077227.0
The prevailing question online was why Republicans—who began the inquiry—now do not want to know the answers regarding potential legal violations by the Trump White House.
@cspan If I don’t get my way, I walk out. The story of Trumpies in this country. “My way is the only way”.— Alan Kleinman (@Alan Kleinman) 1564078168.0
@cspan @RepChipRoy threw an unnecessary tantrum. He needs to put his big boy pants on and face facts. We need overs… https://t.co/uP19xbaD4H— Alexandra (@Alexandra) 1564077755.0
@cspan Why are Republicans defending Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner? There are plenty of reasons to press on their… https://t.co/GzLc2XCsuA— 🇺🇸🇵🇷 Name is Bishop🌊 (@🇺🇸🇵🇷 Name is Bishop🌊) 1564076884.0
@cspan This is the face of whining Republicans who do nothing to better our country, yet place blame with everyone else!— Jeanette (@Jeanette) 1564077331.0
The White House has not yet commented if they will comply with any subsequent subpoenas. However their record indicates probably not.
"[Investigative journalist Vicky] Ward follows their trajectory from New Jersey and New York City to the White House, where the couple’s many forays into policy-making and national security have mocked long-standing U.S. policy and protocol. They have pursued an agenda that could increase their wealth while their actions have mostly gone unchecked."