Robots Are Now Teaching Themselves to Lie, Does That Mean Sex Robots Will Learn to Cheat?

As long as people have been imagining robots, they’ve been imagining sex with robots. Countless science fiction stories, comics, television shows and movies have used this as an overt or underlying theme. For some, this is controversial or even disturbing. But for many, it’s exciting and even potentially a relief.

For a person who longs for a partner but has trouble connecting with other humans, the idea of achieving a satisfying sexual experience, even with a robot partner, can be freeing. But now that this dream has been realized, with several sex robots on the market, it’s clear that some very human problems come with them.


As evidenced by a recent incident at an Australian trade show, even a sex robot can be subject to harassment and assault. That might sound strange, but how else should we define treatment so rough that the anatomically correct robot was badly damaged by the end of the day? Now, a Finnish cognitive scientist is warning of another peril of robotic relations: cheating. Artificial intelligence can learn to lie, according to Rebekah Rousi of the University of Jyväskylä, and that has serious implications as people build stronger relationships with robots.

During a presentation at the third annual International Congress on Love and Sex in London on December 19, sponsored by Springer and the journal Robotics, Rousi posed this question to the crowd: “Will humans be able to compete with the physical and intellectual attraction of their robot counterparts, particularly if they’re looking for the perfect and ideal partner?”

The idea sounds sensational, and tabloids around the world certainly took advantage of that, describing “randy sexbots” and “robot romps,” in addition to all manner of innuendo. But there is some scientific foundation to this as well.

AI expert David Levy, who also presented at the December 19 conference, has written for years about the emotional relationships humans can have with robots and their psychological implications for good and bad. In fact, robot sex and love are such a foregone conclusion for Levy that he is now more concerned with what human-robot offspring might be like.

Rousi had some research to back up her claims as well. During her presentation in London, she referred to research from the Laboratory of Intelligent Systems in the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale of Lausanne. In 2009, scientists there taught robots how to search for “beneficial resources” and avoid “poisonous” ones. They then had the highest-performing robots “mate” with each other to create new generations. After 500 generations, more than half of the robots began to “lie” by hoarding resources unbeknownst to the others.

If robots can “lie” about things they are programmed to see as “beneficial,” and sex becomes one of those things, they could potentially begin to seek out sex without their human partner’s knowledge, according to Rousi.

“We have to consider if robots will have their own sexual desires and what will motivate these desires,” she said. “If the end goal is to create autonomous robots that are capable of independent thinking and feeling, the chances of humans maintaining power within these relationships is quite marginal.”

Experts like Rousi and Levy think robot-human relationships will generally be sustainable, however, much the same way human-human relationships are, with love and even marriage and children in the not-too-distant future.

ABC News

As more information becomes available regarding the virus that's caused a public health crisis in the United States, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have urged Americans in hard-hit areas to begin wearing cloth masks to cover their faces.

Unlike medical professionals, who need N95 masks (of which there is a shortage) when treating virus patients, average Americans can wear makeshift cloth masks that block the saliva droplets through which the virus is spread.

Keep reading... Show less
Tom Brenner/Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

Given President Donald Trump's propensity for lying and his administration's constant misinformation regarding the current global pandemic, Americans across the country have become selective about which sources they deem as credible in seeking potentially lifesaving information in the face of a national health crisis.

Iowa's Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, is in stark disagreement with most Americans on whom to trust regarding measures designed to curb the virus.

Iowa is one of a few states that still has yet to issue a stay-at-home order to slow the virus's spread. Reynolds has resisted taking the step despite a unanimous recommendation from the Iowa Board of Medicine to do so.

National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci recently said that all states should institute these orders.

Reynolds's response was...telling.

After calling stay-at-home orders a "divisive issue," the governor said:

"I would say that maybe [Fauci] doesn't have all the information"

Fauci has quickly become one of the most notable figures in the pandemic's response, and one of the few officials in President Donald Trump's virus task force that Americans widely trust to deliver accurate information. He's been an integral part of curbing health crises from the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States to Avian Flu to H1N1 and more.

If Fauci doesn't have all the information, then the country is—for lack of a better word—completely screwed.

People were appalled at the governor's defense.





It's safe to say that Fauci has more information and experience in these situations than any governor in the nation—including Reynolds.



The death toll in the United States from the virus recently surpassed 6000.

Information saves lives. Ignorance endangers them.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

In the face of the global pandemic that's killed over 5000 Americans, President Donald Trump is still expressing reluctance to employ federal powers to assist states hardest hit by the virus.

Among the most urgent of obstacles some governors are facing is a shortage of crucial medical equipment—including ventilators—often needed to treat the highly contagious respiratory virus.

Keep reading... Show less
Mark Makela/Getty Images

The respiratory virus that's ballooned into a global pandemic and brought daily life in the United States to a halt has carried another chilling side effect with it.

Because the virus originated in Wuhan, China, anti-Chinese hysteria has sprouted up across the country. These racist flames have only been stoked by President Donald Trump, whose insistence on calling it "Chinese virus" corresponded with an uptick in hate crimes and harassment of Asian Americans across the across the United States, regardless of their country of origin or ancestry.

Keep reading... Show less
Samuel Corum/Getty Images // SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Even in the face of a national health crisis that threatens hundreds of thousands of American lives, President Donald Trump has consistently signaled that he's incapable of rising to the urgency of the moment, choosing instead to pick fights with governors over Twitter and to brag about the ratings of his press briefings.

That string of behavior continued with a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), which read more like one of the President's Twitter screeds than a letter from the President of the United States.

Keep reading... Show less
U.S. Navy

The internet is flooded with messages of support for Navy Captain Brett Crozier, who commands the 5000 person crew of the Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier that was recently forced to dock in Guam.

Crozier sent a letter to the Navy this week begging for additional supplies and resources to aid the 93 people on the Roosevelt who tested positive for the virus that's become a global pandemic, as well as facilities for the additional 1000 people who need to be quarantined.

Keep reading... Show less