Microsoft Wants To Take Our Data Where It’s Never Been Before

Credit: Source.

[DIGEST: NYTimes, Fortune, Data Center Knowledge]

How often do you think about data? Many of us consider it only when our mobile plans inform us we are nearing, or have exceeded, our monthly data usage limit. But data is always there, and it has to be stored somewhere.

The team behind Microsoft’s Project Natick proposes we move our data beneath us, under the sea. Its website suggests: “50% of us live near the coast. Why doesn’t our data?”

Credit: Source.

Every link we click, photo we upload, Amazon page we browse, GIF we share, and word we publish must sit somewhere, permanently. Even if you never scroll down your Facebook page to see what you wrote three years ago, it remains stored in a data center, for posterity.

Information on the Internet is stored on servers in massive data farms around the world. These farms take up acres upon acres of land, and are filled with rows of loud, chugging machines that store data, and serve it as quickly as possible when requested.

The Internet, its user base, and the data created by its users continue to grow. In turn, the physical footprint of data centers must grow to accommodate additional servers. As competing web service companies such as Google and Amazon buy more land to house data

centers around the world, real estate costs climb accordingly.

What’s more, companies are facing increasing energy costs to maintain these centers, and this is causing a number of concerns among the world’s largest technology companies. Data centers are not particularly sustainable or efficient. According to the National Resources Defense Council:

“Data centers are one of the largest and fastest growing consumers of electricity in the United States. In 2013, U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 91 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity – enough electricity to power all the households in New York City twice over – and are on-track to reach 140 billion kilowatt-hours by 2020.”

This electricity is primarily used to cool servers so they can perform optimally and avoid overheating—and crashing. To keep a server in pristine condition, data companies must keep their centers between 64 and 80 degrees Fahrenheit. If you consider how much it costs to keep your home that cool in the summer—without massive machines that produce extreme amounts of heat—you can imagine how costly this is for data centers.

Technology companies such as Facebook are buying land and building data centers in cooler climates with cheaper available power sources. But, as Will Rogers once said, “Buy land, they ain’t making any more of the stuff.”

Facebook's Sweden Data Center. Credit: Source.

What happens when we run out of land?

To explore the feasibility of submerging our data under the waves, Microsoft’s team of scientists and researchers created the Leona Philpot “self-contained data center.” Named after a character in Microsoft’s Xbox video game Halo, the Leona Philpot is meant to

exist deep under the sea, either on the seafloor, or possibly even bobbing in a jelly-bean-like container.

Placing data centers underwater, Microsoft hopes, will leverage the cooler temperature of the surrounding water as a substitute for the expensive and energy-sapping cooling systems in their existing above-ground data centers. Microsoft is also considering adding tidal energy systems or turbines to help power the underwater contraption and further increase its sustainability.

Beyond its inexpensive cooling and operational benefits, this experimental housing for data could also deliver faster Internet service to major metropolitan areas, due to their proximity to the coasts. (Being physically closer to data makes retrieving and serving it quicker.)

A 2014 research paper written by Microsoft data center employees first floated the idea of an underwater data center solution. Yet Microsoft is still in the early testing phases of Project Natick. According to a timeline on Microsoft’s Project Natick website:

“After a very successful series of tests, the Leona Philpot (was) lifted out of the water and (was) brought back to Redmond for analysis and refitting.”

This is where their story stops, for now.

Even if Project Natick does not succeed in sending our information under the sea, Microsoft is confident that its findings and research will lead to other potential solutions to our connected planet’s growing data challenges.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less