oh-myyy-ribbon

Our Consumption of Iodized Salt Is on the Decline, Will Our IQs Follow?

A man tests iodine in salt during a monitoring visit in a salt market in Alexandria, Egypt. June 4, 2007. (Majority World/UIG via Getty Images)

While the medical community disagrees about the value of many nutritional supplements, some added nutrients have made an undeniable impact on public health — including one that has the power to raise IQs. Iodine is a critical micronutrient that humans require for good health, successful reproduction and healthy brain development.

Iodine deficiency leads to problems with the thyroid, including cancer, hypothyroidism and goiter. Goiter is a condition in which the thyroid swells up and is visible in the neck, causing swallowing and respiratory problems. In children, iodine deficiency is a leading cause of stunted body growth and intellectual deficiencies, including mental handicaps. The problem isn’t just limited to the developing world; Europe has one-fifth of the world’s iodine deficiency cases.


While iodine naturally occurs in many foods, including fish, dairy products and vegetables grown in coastal areas, it is naturally scarce in many places. Until 1924, iodine deficiency was a leading cause of health issues in the United States, including widespread goiter in the Great Lakes, Appalachians, and Pacific Northwest — sometimes called the goiter belt — until the Morton Salt Company started adding the ingredient to common table salt. Two years earlier, Switzerland mandated that salt be fortified with iodine after the country found that 30 percent of its young men were unfit for military service due to goiter, and since then, around 120 countries around the world have implemented iodine supplementation programs. At a cost of only $0.05 cents per person per year, it’s a remarkably cheap public health initiative with tremendous benefits.

One of the benefits turned out to be an increase in IQ in populations with access to iodized salt. Research on men who had access to iodized salt found an increased IQ by as much as 15 points. Men who had access to iodine had a greater chance of getting into the more selective Air Force. The boost in IQ averaged out to an increased IQ of 3.5 points over populations pre-dating the 1920s.

Today, however, our changing dietary habits may be causing increasing levels of iodine deficiency again. Worries about hypertension have caused many Americans to limit salt in their diets, and the popularity of non-iodinized sea salt in cooking has led to decreased levels of iodine in others. Changes to the way wheat is processed in recent years also reduced the amount of iodine in flour. Additionally, the proliferation of processed foods in the American diet means that many people can’t say how much iodine they are actually getting — while it is added to table salt, food processors typically use salt that that is not fortified with iodine. In other words, eating more chips won’t get you this vital nutrient.

Drinking milk will — as long as it’s cow’s milk. The amount of iodine in milk substitutes is very low; Cows’ milk provides around 70μg (micrograms) per glass, a considerable proportion of the daily recommended 150μg iodine intake recommended for adults. A glass of milk substitute may provide only around two micrograms. As milk substitutes like almond milk and soy milk become more popular, some nutrition experts are becoming concerned that pregnant woman who favor these alternatives aren’t getting enough iodine to facilitate proper brain development in their babies.

Between 1971 and 2001, the iodine intake in the US dropped by 50 percent. The effects on public health could be significant. A National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development study found that women who were deficient in iodine had more fertility problems — and only 56 percent of American women had adequate iodine levels. Doctors recommend that women take prenatal vitamins with iodine for three months before trying to become pregnant.

Another curious twist to the story of iodine: Iodine is derives from potassium iodide, a salt of stable iodine that is suddenly the hottest supplement in the US, because it is believed by some to protect against radiation poisoning in the event of a nuclear bomb attack. As tensions between Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-Um escalate, sales of potassium iodide are skyrocketing.

“On January 2, I basically got in a month’s supply of potassium iodide and I sold out in 48 hours,” said Troy Jones, who runs the website nukepills.com. Alan Morris, president of the pharmaceutical firm Anbex Inc., which sells potassium iodide, also says sales have increased. “We are a wonderful barometer of the level of anxiety in the country,” he said.

But will it save you? Potassium iodide could prevent your thyroid from absorbing radioactive iodine released in a nuclear attack or in the event of a nuclear power plant accident, but it won’t protect other parts of your body. "[It is a reasonable treatment, but it is certainly not the entire story," said James J. Galligan, Ph.D., a professor of pharmacology and toxicology and director of the neuroscience program at Michigan State University. "People must protect themselves from the other risks.”

If you don’t have access to potassium iodide, iodized salt isn’t a reasonable alternative. However, antacids may be. Plus, stockpiling those will be useful if worrying over nuclear war is giving you heartburn.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less
CNN

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less