A Star Trek Fan Trolled a Scientific Journal in the Most Incredibly Nerdy Way

Scientific publishing is a tough business. But it can also be a lucrative one, which is why even the esteemed pages of science journals may not always be above the fray. While many legitimate publications dutifully peer-review and edit the work they receive, pirates abound. These so-called predatory journals focus more on the money than the science, and for a researcher desperate to publish, a few hundred dollars and an easy peer-review process might seem too good to pass up.

The controversy has gained increasing attention over the past few years, thanks in large part to sneaky scientists like “BioTrekkie,” also known, to a few journals at least, as Lewis Zimmerman. The anonymous biologist is a pretty big Star Trek fan (if you couldn’t tell from the pseudonym), and he decided to test out whether some of the most notorious predatory journals were as well. The paper he submitted described an “experiment” that would be familiar to anyone who has seen Star Trek: Voyager Episode 32, “Threshold,” in which Lt. Thomas Paris makes an effort to finally break warp 10 speed.


On the show, Paris manages to finally break the elusive time-space barrier, but the effects are… unpleasant. He morphs into a fish/frog-like creature, as does Capt. Kathryn Janeway, whom he kidnapped to come along with him on his experimental journey. In the Star Trek storyline, the two procreate and have amphibious space babies before returning to their normal human form.

This is pretty much what happens in “Zimmerman’s” experiment as well. BioTrekkie made a small effort to mask the obvious by using technical language in the paper, but anyone familiar with the series (or real-world biology and physics, for that matter) should have been able to pick up on it. Unless, of course, that’s not what they were looking for.

BioTrekkie submitted the paper to 10 journals suspected of charging authors for publication without doing much editing or review. He listed himself and six other Star Trek crewmembers as co-authors, listing their affiliation as the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Starfleet Academy. Ultimately, four journals accepted the paper and one — the American Research Journal of Biosciences — published it. (The paper, “Rapid Genetic and Developmental Morphological Change Following Extreme Celerity,” has since been deleted from the journal’s website.)

BioTrekkie isn’t the first to expose a predatory journal in action. Last year, another scientist conducted a similar sting using a Star Wars plotline. Four journals fell for that one, too. In both cases, the journals asked for several hundred dollars for publication. In BioTrekkie’s case, the fee was ultimately negotiated down to $50.

So, how does this happen? Experts say it’s an unfortunate consequence of the opening up of scientific research. It’s expensive to subscribe to an academic journal, so open-access journals have been flourishing. Instead of subscriptions, these journals make money by charging authors for submissions. In some cases, as with the well-known open-access journal PLOS ONE, this arrangement is mutually beneficial and opens up science communication in a necessary way.  

Some, however, have taken this opening up of science research as an opportunity to game the system. These predatory journals are “essentially counterfeit journals, mimicking the look and feel of legitimate online journals, but with the singular goal of making easy money,” said Jeffrey Beall, a research librarian at the University of Colorado.

It can be hard to tell whether or not an online open-access journal is legit, but BioTrekkie suggests perusing their websites carefully and trying to assess the validity of the other papers published there. Even this can be deceiving, however. Even the American Research Journal of Biosciences seems to publish some legitimate research, leading BioTrekkie to wonder whether researchers desperate to publish their real work might have been fooled.

Michael Reynolds - Pool/Getty Images

Since the start of his campaign, President Donald Trump's support among Black voters has remained pitifully low.

Despite claims that he's the "least racist person" alive, Trump told four Congresswomen of color to "go back" where they came from, defended unapologetic white supremacists, put forth racist immigration policies, and currently employs at least one white nationalist in the White House—and that's just during his presidency.

Keep reading...
Alex Wong/Getty Images // Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images

Since her upset primary victory in the summer of 2018, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and her progressive agenda have become a favorite target of the Right wing.

The party that claims to champion people who "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" often derides Ocasio-Cortez's former career as a bartender in Manhattan—a position she took after college when her father's death put her family in dire financial straits.

Keep reading...
Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Two months after it emerged in Wuhan, China, the coronavirus has spread throughout Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, North America, and sub-Saharan Africa with nearly 84,000 cases worldwide.

The United States is scrambling to prepare for an outbreak that officials have deemed inevitable—but President Donald Trump and his staff are saying the concern is overblown.

Keep reading...
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

All too often, words seem insufficient to describe the latest scandal or atrocity from the administration of President Donald Trump.

That's usually when The New Yorker steps in.

Famous for its headline-free covers, illustrators have perfectly captured the administration's mob-like tendencies or the subservience of once respected Senators to Trump's every whim.

Keep reading...
Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The State Department is responsible for not only foreign relations and embassy operations outside the USA, they also take care of United States citizens and permanent residents when they work and travel in foreign nations.

In response to natural disaster, political unrest or pandemics, the State Department does whatever necessary to safely evacuate USA citizens and residents while mitigating any risks to the rest of the population of the country.

At least that's what is supposed to happen.

Keep reading...
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Despite the growing threat of the rapidly-spreading coronavirus, President Donald Trump has taken repeated steps to dismiss the need for widespread drastic action to contain an outbreak in the United States that experts have deemed inevitable.

But how could a President possibly benefit from being cavalier about a pandemic?

Keep reading...