Set An Alarm For The Big Bang: “Clock” Particles Could Measure Beginning Of The Universe

Credit: Source.

[DIGEST: IFLScience, SciTech Daily, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology]

What happened after the Big Bang? If scientists are right, the answer lies in the ticking of primordial clocks.

Since the discovery that our Universe is expanding, cosmologists have put forward ideas about how the Universe began. Was there a Big Crunch before the Big Bang? Did the Universe expand quickly or slowly?

“Imagine you took the frames of a movie and stacked them all randomly on top of each other. If those frames aren’t labeled with a time, you can’t put them in order,” says Xingang Chen of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) and the University of Texas at Dallas. “Did the primordial universe crunch or bang? If you don’t know whether the movie is running forward or in reverse, you can’t tell the difference.”

Credit: Source.

Because the beginning of the cosmos isn’t viewable by even our most powerful telescopes, it’s been impossible to prove which theory is correct, but a new paper published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics seeks answers in the massive particle signatures found in the afterglow of the Big Bang, called the cosmic microwave background (CMB).

Fluctuations from the particles on the CMB, which existed for just a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, may contain time stamps of the early Universe.

Until now, distinguishing between different expansion scenarios involved searching for traces of gravitational waves in the CMB. These theoretical studies give clues to the spatial variations in the primordial Universe, but lack information on the passage of time.

The research of Xingang Chen, Yi Wang, and Mohammad Hossein Namjoo suggests a different method. "Here we are proposing a new approach that could allow us to directly reveal the evolutionary history of the primordial universe from astrophysical signals,” says Chen.

"Ticks of these primordial standard clocks would create corresponding wiggles in measurements of the cosmic microwave background, whose pattern is unique for each scenario," says study co-author Yi Wang.

According to Chen, Wang and Namjoo’s research, subatomic heavy particles like those found on the CMB will oscillate back and forth in a universal and standard way. These oscillations would act as clock ticks, providing a way to measure the passage of time at the beginning of the Universe.

Credit: Source.

“From observing the oscillation of the massive particles, we are able to reconstruct when fluctuations are created in the primordial universe,” notes Wang. “Soon, we may be able to verify the evolutionary history towards how our universe was created, which has remained a myth for so long.”

Current data isn’t accurate enough to spot such small variations, but ongoing projects like BICEP3, which uses an unprecedented total of 2,560 detectors to study the CMB, may soon become powerful enough to provide precise measurements that scientists can use to solve the mystery of what happened after the Big Bang.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less