[DIGEST: Aeon, Washington Post, PETA]

No-kill animal shelters, which have recently become popular across America, sound like such a nice idea. One imagines homeless pets lovingly cared for, socialized, given food and medical care, and offered to loving and safe “forever homes.”


Well-meaning adopters, aghast at the idea of county-run shelters that destroy pets with dangerous behavior issues or illnesses, embrace the idea of adopting from a homey no-kill organization. Yet there are little to no regulations or standards for no-kill shelters. No veterinary or boarding experience is required.

Armed with the ability to run a rudimentary website with pictures of adoptable pets, and a place to keep the animals, many such agencies are able to collect hundred of dollars in adoption fees, while foisting ill, contagious or dying animals onto unsuspecting adopters.

CREDIT: Source

In a recent essay in Aeon Magazine, Sabine Heinlein recounts her experience of adopting a cat from a no-kill organization. The shelter assured her that the cat was microchipped, had received basic veterinary care and nutrition, and was given a clean bill of health before the adoption. None of this turned out to be true. But the animal looked well, if thin, and Heinlein and her partner took him home. Once home, however, they began to notice alarming symptoms. After spending $1,500 on “tests, dewormers, antibiotics and dental care,” they learned that their cat suffered from life-threatening diseases that were contagious to humans. Before the cat was completely well, Heinlein and her partner had spent $2,500 on treatment, and discovered the dirty secret of the no-kill industry. Specifically, that sometimes no-kill is the inhumane option.

PETA keeps a running list of no-kill shelters and organizations operating outside of animal welfare laws. All over the United States, on a regular basis, no-kill shelters are found to be hoarding animals in filthy and unsafe conditions. It is not uncommon to hear about dead and very sick animals, living in horrifying situations. Other organizations were found to be complete shams. One such Labrador rescue organization was run by a woman with a website full of stock photos of Labrador dogs. She listed them for adoption, took money from several people, and promised healthy new dogs—that she didn’t have. Victims of the scam received no dogs, nor did they receive refunds. The owner of the site has since been charged with larceny. Still, the situation is not unique.

CREDIT: Source

Many veterinarians oppose no-kill shelters. Peggy Larson, a veterinarian in Vermont, said, “I am very much against the ‘no kill’ movement. For many reasons. Unsuitable and dangerous

animals are being released to the public. Animals in these ‘no kill’ shelters pile up and live horrible lives in tiny cages for long periods of time. They come in without health certificates and carry diseases.”

CREDIT: Source

If no-kill shelters accept all animals, without regard to health or life expectancy, they can quickly become overrun with animals with severe behavioral issues or illnesses, including feline AIDS and leukemia, cat scratch fever, parvo, and other devastating and contagious diseases. Animals who were healthy before entering the shelter may become ill, and most shelters do not have the resources to keep up with their care. What becomes of a place where too many animals need food and medical attention, but either no one is adopting them, or the families who do adopt them find themselves with a nightmare on their hands? It is neither humane nor ethical to simply collect sick animals and continue to house and feed them indefinitely.

Potential pet adopters should know that not every no-kill shelter is a den of animal abuse; many are well-run, caring and responsible organizations. However, it can be difficult to discern the decent from the deplorable, and would-be pet adopters need to be alert for signs that an agency is not legitimate, such as bad reviews online, or demanding payment before adopters can meet an animal.

Adopting pets can sometimes feel like a game of roulette, where you spin for a companion and land instead on a sick and miserable animal who may require more care than you can afford. What should potential pet owners do to ensure the animals they adopt are healthy and safe to bring home? How can one person know if the no-kill shelter in their area is run with care and diligence? Most ethical shelters ask that all residents of the home where the animal will reside meet the animal and agree to adoption. Many shelters ask if the home is rented or owned, and often have questionnaires and applications regarding proper animal care. If the shelter works with a local veterinarian, prospective pet owners should call the vet office to confirm this and to ask about the animals’ condition at their vet visits. Most importantly, prospective owners should be vigilant for signs that the shelter is more concerned about securing their adoption fee than ensuring the animals’ welfare.

CREDIT: Source

ABC News

As more information becomes available regarding the virus that's caused a public health crisis in the United States, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have urged Americans in hard-hit areas to begin wearing cloth masks to cover their faces.

Unlike medical professionals, who need N95 masks (of which there is a shortage) when treating virus patients, average Americans can wear makeshift cloth masks that block the saliva droplets through which the virus is spread.

Keep reading... Show less
Tom Brenner/Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

Given President Donald Trump's propensity for lying and his administration's constant misinformation regarding the current global pandemic, Americans across the country have become selective about which sources they deem as credible in seeking potentially lifesaving information in the face of a national health crisis.

Iowa's Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, is in stark disagreement with most Americans on whom to trust regarding measures designed to curb the virus.

Iowa is one of a few states that still has yet to issue a stay-at-home order to slow the virus's spread. Reynolds has resisted taking the step despite a unanimous recommendation from the Iowa Board of Medicine to do so.

National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci recently said that all states should institute these orders.

Reynolds's response was...telling.

After calling stay-at-home orders a "divisive issue," the governor said:

"I would say that maybe [Fauci] doesn't have all the information"

Fauci has quickly become one of the most notable figures in the pandemic's response, and one of the few officials in President Donald Trump's virus task force that Americans widely trust to deliver accurate information. He's been an integral part of curbing health crises from the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States to Avian Flu to H1N1 and more.

If Fauci doesn't have all the information, then the country is—for lack of a better word—completely screwed.

People were appalled at the governor's defense.





It's safe to say that Fauci has more information and experience in these situations than any governor in the nation—including Reynolds.



The death toll in the United States from the virus recently surpassed 6000.

Information saves lives. Ignorance endangers them.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

In the face of the global pandemic that's killed over 5000 Americans, President Donald Trump is still expressing reluctance to employ federal powers to assist states hardest hit by the virus.

Among the most urgent of obstacles some governors are facing is a shortage of crucial medical equipment—including ventilators—often needed to treat the highly contagious respiratory virus.

Keep reading... Show less
Mark Makela/Getty Images

The respiratory virus that's ballooned into a global pandemic and brought daily life in the United States to a halt has carried another chilling side effect with it.

Because the virus originated in Wuhan, China, anti-Chinese hysteria has sprouted up across the country. These racist flames have only been stoked by President Donald Trump, whose insistence on calling it "Chinese virus" corresponded with an uptick in hate crimes and harassment of Asian Americans across the across the United States, regardless of their country of origin or ancestry.

Keep reading... Show less
Samuel Corum/Getty Images // SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Even in the face of a national health crisis that threatens hundreds of thousands of American lives, President Donald Trump has consistently signaled that he's incapable of rising to the urgency of the moment, choosing instead to pick fights with governors over Twitter and to brag about the ratings of his press briefings.

That string of behavior continued with a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), which read more like one of the President's Twitter screeds than a letter from the President of the United States.

Keep reading... Show less
U.S. Navy

The internet is flooded with messages of support for Navy Captain Brett Crozier, who commands the 5000 person crew of the Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier that was recently forced to dock in Guam.

Crozier sent a letter to the Navy this week begging for additional supplies and resources to aid the 93 people on the Roosevelt who tested positive for the virus that's become a global pandemic, as well as facilities for the additional 1000 people who need to be quarantined.

Keep reading... Show less