White House Correspondents' Association Just Fired Back at Donald Trump for Threatening to Take Media Credentials Away

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 08: U.S. President Donald Trump announces his decision to withdraw the United States from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in the Diplomatic Room at the White House May 8, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump once again assailed the news media, accusing members of the press of "working overtime" to propagate so-called "fake news" about him and his administration, and threatened to take away press credentials.

"The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake)," the president wrote on Twitter. "

Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials?"

The tweet prompted a response from Margaret Talev, the president of the White House Correspondents' Association, which represents the White House press corps in its dealings with the Trump administration:

Some may excuse the president's inflammatory rhetoric about the media, but just because the president does not like news coverage does not make it fake. A free press must be able to report on the good, the bad, the momentous and the mundane, without fear or favor. And a president preventing a free and independent press from covering the workings of our republic would be an unconscionable assault on the First Amendment.

The WHCA had this morning been criticized by Eric Boehlert, a writer at Sharebluewho'd previously worked for Salon and Rolling Stone.

"What a joke that 'journalism' organization has become," Boehlert tweeted.

The president often criticizes major news outlets for their coverage of him and his administration but has curried favor with the likes of Sean Hannity, Alex Jones and his Infowars website, and The Gateway Pundit, all of which have been known to spread conspiracy theories. (The president even granted Gateway Pundit press credentials, allowing reporters with the outlet to attend White House press briefings.)

However, revoking press credentials does not mean media outlets can't cover the president, and several political figures and news reporters soon condemned the president's statements, calling him out for his continued hostility.

"These authoritarian impulses of yours are anti-American," Walter Shaub, the former Director of the United States Office of Government Ethics, tweeted in response.

"He has a lack of understanding of how news coverage actually works, and unfortunately so do a lot of his supporters," Maggie Haberman of The New York Times. Haberman was part of a team that earlier this year won a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on the president's advisers and their connections to Russia.

Others also weighed in.

"That's his definition of fake news — anything that he doesn't like. That's actually not the definition of fake!" CNN's Jake Tapper, whom the administration has often singled out for his tenacity during press briefings, during an appearance on The View.

You can watch the clip below:

Chris Cillizza, whose often scathing minute-by-minute editorials and examinations on the president's actions have contributed to the president's disdain for CNN, observed: "Any time President Trump says 'fake news' sub in the words 'bad for me.' That's what he really means anyway."

The president's outburst comes just a day after The Washington Post and other news outlets confirmed that Michael Cohen, his personal lawyer and fixer, received $500,000 from New York investment firm Columbus Nova, which retained Cohen as a consultant “regarding potential sources of capital and potential investments in real estate and other ventures.” The firm is the affiliate of the Renova Group, founded by Viktor Vekselberg, a Russian business magnate.

Cohen has found himself at the center of the questions regarding a payment Stephanie Clifford, an adult film actress better known as Stormy Daniels, received from him as part of the non-disclosure agreement to keep her from discussing a sexual encounter with Trump back in 2006, while he was married to his current wife, Melania, and just a few months after Melania gave birth to their son, Barron. A separate lawsuit filed by Clifford contends that Cohen initiated a “bogus arbitration” hearing against her without notifying her beforehand, and a copy of the restraining order against Clifford confirms that the judge made a “one-party” ruling that did not require her to be notified.

Cohen has claimed that he paid Clifford out of his own pocket and that the president never reimbursed him for the settlement. But during a highly publicized 60 Minutes broadcast, Clifford’s attorney, Michael Avenatti, presented documents showing that the payment was sent to Cohen at his Trump Tower location, and communicated through his official Trump Organization email, indicating that he made the payment on Trump’s behalf. Analysts have posited that the exchange of funds could well be an illegal campaign expenditure on Trump’s behalf.

Michael Avenatti, a lawyer for Clifford, yesterday circulated a document detailing Cohen's connections to the Russian oligarch.

The Washington Post's confirmation lends further credibility to Clifford's claims that Cohen and the president attempted to silence her, an account over which the president, most recently through his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has only continued to contradict himself.


Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less
gbuck_jr/Twitter; National Archives

The Republican Party again raised ire and eyebrows with yet another GOP candidate advocating violence against members of Congress in official campaign materials.

This time it is George Buck Jr. of Florida. The GOP politician is running for the 13th congressional district—a seat currently held by Democrat Charlie Crist.

Keep reading... Show less
Win McNamee/Getty Images // Hogan Gidley/Twitter

President Donald Trump's press team is working overtime to discredit media coverage of the impeachment hearings against their boss.

The House Judiciary Committee began its hearings today, with four constitutional scholars—Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman, and Jonathan Turley—tasked with testifying about the constitutionality of impeaching Donald Trump. The former three were invited by Democrats, who hold the majority, while Turley was invited by Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less

The House Intelligence Committee submitted to the House Judiciary Committee its 300 page report of information gleaned from fact witnesses so far in the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

In addition to reiterating the testimony of several witnesses regarding Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine, the report also highlighted call records between numerous key players in the Ukraine scandal.

Keep reading... Show less