Subsidized On-Site Cafeterias in Silicon Valley Are Found to Have a Detrimental Effect on Local Businesses & Food Establishments

It makes sense.

Facebook offices are known for their free gourmet cafeterias staffed by former restaurant chefs and featuring ramen bars and on-site smoke shacks. It’s no wonder employees don’t have much interest in wandering off campus for lunch.

One Silicon Valley city doesn’t like that, and other cities may be starting to follow suit.

Mountain View, Calif., at the southern end of the San Francisco Bay Area peninsula, is gearing up to host a new satellite location for the social media behemoth, headquartered just north in Menlo Park. However, unlike other offices such as the headquarters building itself and the East Coast facility in New York, the Mountain View locale will not boast a free cafeteria with endless desserts, kombucha taps and a carving station.

Why not? Because, critics argue, the lack of foot traffic from workers taking lunch breaks hurts surrounding restaurants, retailers and the local economy in general.

“Restaurants often provide the anchor to get people on the street, and while they’re out they patron other retail,” Gwyneth Borden, executive director of the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, told Business Insider. “While there will always be competition for the food dollar, it goes without saying that it’s hard to compete with free.”

In late July, legislators in San Francisco proposed a city-wide ban on workplace cafeterias, inspired by the effect the headquarters for Twitter and Airbnb — which both feature on-site cafeterias —  had on their surrounding neighborhoods. Restaurants that opened in Twitter’s neighborhood, Mid-Market, in the wake of Twitter’s 2012 relocation, have particularly struggled in attracting foot traffic and many have since closed.

“Having (tech workers) in their offices and not engaging with the community isn’t really good for the community or these small businesses,” Chris Foley, co-owner of the Market, a food hall underneath Twitter’s headquarters, told The San Francisco Chronicle.

The legislation, if accepted and passed, would be retroactive and apply to new businesses only.

The aim, according to San Francisco Supervisor Aaron Peskin, is to mitigate the “Amazon effect that impacts retail and restaurants across the county,” he told the SF Examiner. “People will have to go out and eat lunch with the rest of us.”

Load more...

Page 1 of 2
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | Next | Last
View All



type in your search and press enter
Generic filters
Exact matches only