• Categories
  • Archives

READ: Donald Trump Tweets ‘Washington Examiner – ‘MAGA List: 205 ‘Historic Results’ Help Trump Make Case for 2020 Re-Election.’ True!’

Fake news.
Washington Examiner Twitter MAGA tweet 205 list propaganda Media Bias/Fact Check MBFC

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump may well be remembered partly for his adversarial relationship with the press. Beginning during his campaign for President, Trump attacked the free press as “fake news” whenever they shared facts critical of him.

But Trump’s hatred of the press doesn’t extend to all news outlets. His mutual admiration with the denizens of the couch on Fox News morning show Fox and Friends is well documented. The show is accused of being little more than Trump administration propaganda and the President is criticized for treating the show as an official policy adviser.

Other ultra-right wing shows and conspiracy theory media pundits such as Breitbart and the now largely defunct Infowars also have the ear of the President. Now another new favorite has emerged, the political journalism website and weekly magazine, the Washington Examiner.

On Tuesday President Trump touted a story shared by the Washington Examiner on his Twitter account. He posted:

“Washington Examiner – ‘MAGA list: 205 ‘historic results’ help Trump make case for 2020 re-election.’ True!”

So what was the story?

An exclusive list, created by President Trump and his “top White House aides” and given to the Washington Examiner for publication in their column, “Washington Secrets.” So the President shared that a list of accomplishments—that he created about himself—are true.

People were quick to point this out to the President.

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC), an independent organization that assesses news outlets, puts the Washington Examiner at “right bias“. Organizations are ranked by MBFC on a scale from Extreme Left, Left, LeftCenter Left, Least Biased, Right-Center, Right to Extreme Right biases.

MBFC describes the Washington Examiner as “media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.”

This is not to say that Washington Examiner is untrustworthy, just that they may not dispute the claims made by right-wing media sources and that some of their sources are not trustworthy—like someone who writes a list of their own accomplishments based on their own opinion of themself.

People had plenty to say about the validity of Trump’s self-assessment, shared exclusively with a right biased news site.

Page 1 of 2
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | Next | Last
View All

Tags:

  • Hide Comments

70 Shares