oh-myyy-ribbon

People Think They Know Why Donald Trump Is Choosing the People He Wants to Pardon, and Suddenly It All Makes Sense

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures toward journalists shouting questions as he departs the White House May 29, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

In the United States, the pardon power for federal crimes is granted to the president by the Constitution. It states the president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment".

So far, President Donald Trump has pardoned five people. By comparison, President Barack Obama pardoned 212 people in his 8 years in office. President George W. Bush similarly pardoned 200. But most of the prior two presidents' pardons went to relative unknowns.


Trump's pardons, however, went to fairly well known figures; people like Joe Arpaio, Dinesh D’Souza and Scooter Libby. And his latest list of potential pardons floated to the press, former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich and media personality Martha Stewart, indicate more of the same.

Blagojevich is currently in prison after being found guilty of attempting to trade the Senate seat left vacant when Obama became president. Stewart served her sentence for conspiracy and other charges after being investigated for insider trading.

The choices seem designed to mostly appeal to Trump's support base or to targeted groups. Joshua Dressler, professor emeritus of law at Ohio State University, called the pardons politically motivated.

It’s not based upon some sense of rehabilitation or evidence of innocence. It just has a political overtone to it."

But is there another motive at work here aside from media attention or political points with his supporters? Do these individuals, with the notable exception of the posthumous pardon of boxer Jack Johnson who died in 1946, have anything else in common?

According to former top Federal Bureau of Investigation official Robert Grant, who headed the Chicago FBI office during Blagojevich's prosecution, the pardons are proof of the president's pettiness.

It’s so disheartening to think that the president of the United States would overturn the evidence heard by a judge and jury, all out of an animus toward Bob Mueller, James Comey and Pat Fitzgerald."

"Blagojevich got caught by wiretaps and microphones and he was engaging in a practice that we believed he was taking part in for quite awhile," Grant pointed out. "I don’t think anybody who listened to those tapes would think anything but it was an incredibly corrupt governor who was dealing with corrupt associates."

Special Counsel Robert Mueller served as FBI director during the Blagojevich probe, while James Comey was deputy attorney general and Patrick Fitzgerald served as U.S. attorney in Chicago.

Grant said the pardons serve as just one more way to try to discredit the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and any connections to the Trump campaign.

"So if Trump gets himself into an obstruction of justice case or lies, then that’s OK. But that’s not the case for the poor kid on the South Side," Grant said referring to the unequal application of justice to settle scores instead of showing mercy or righting wrongs.

I think [Trump] tries to hurt anybody he doesn’t like. He will use his office because he can. Not to use it judiciously, but out of spite and animus. When the framers of the Constitution framed that power, I don’t think they envisioned this."

Blagojevich's conviction covers a vast array of activities including attempting to get $25,000 from the CEO of a children’s hospital, delaying signing a horse racing bill while trying to get a $100,000 donation and attempting to turn his appointment power to fill a Senate seat into cash.

Stewart was prosecuted by Comey. Fitzgerald, who prosecuted Blagojevich, is a longtime Comey friend and is on the former FBI director’s current legal team.

Trump, speaking to reporters on Air Force One, claimed the former governor’s actions did not merit a 14 year sentence and he “shouldn’t have been put in jail.” Blagojevich appeared on Trump's TV show, Celebrity Apprentice.

Stewart, Trump stated, "was harshly and unfairly treated." The president also could not resist adding "she used to be my biggest fan in the world."

Trump made no claims of either's innocence nor cited any sentencing guidelines to indicate their sentences were excessive or unusual.

Andy Wright, associate professor at Savannah Law School, pointed out a similar motive behind the D'Souza pardon.

It should not be lost on us that Preet Bharara’s office prosecuted D’Souza, and Trump is settling a political score by means of this pardon."

Trump fired Bharara, the former United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Bharara was and remains a vocal critic of the president.

D'Souza himself couldn't help but taunt Bharara online.

But Bharara had a response of his own. He pointed out D'Souza was no victim of injustice. He broke the law, but got a get out of jail free card from Trump. That pardon doesn't erase his crimes or make him innocent.

CNN

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less
gbuck_jr/Twitter; National Archives

The Republican Party again raised ire and eyebrows with yet another GOP candidate advocating violence against members of Congress in official campaign materials.

This time it is George Buck Jr. of Florida. The GOP politician is running for the 13th congressional district—a seat currently held by Democrat Charlie Crist.

Keep reading... Show less
Win McNamee/Getty Images // Hogan Gidley/Twitter

President Donald Trump's press team is working overtime to discredit media coverage of the impeachment hearings against their boss.

The House Judiciary Committee began its hearings today, with four constitutional scholars—Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman, and Jonathan Turley—tasked with testifying about the constitutionality of impeaching Donald Trump. The former three were invited by Democrats, who hold the majority, while Turley was invited by Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less
@atrupar/Twitter

The House Intelligence Committee submitted to the House Judiciary Committee its 300 page report of information gleaned from fact witnesses so far in the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

In addition to reiterating the testimony of several witnesses regarding Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine, the report also highlighted call records between numerous key players in the Ukraine scandal.

Keep reading... Show less