Trump Wants to Slash HIV/AIDS Funding, and It Could Mean Death for Thousands Around the World

US President Donald Trump speaks during a bilateral meeting with Ireland's Prime Minister Leo Varadkar in the Oval Office of the White House on March 15, 2018 in Washington, DC. / AFP PHOTO / MANDEL NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

As part of his 2019 budget, President Trump is cutting funding for HIV/AIDS programs — again. This is a significant blow to people living with HIV/AIDS and not the first time that Trump has demonstrated a lack of support for those programs.

According to The Huffington Post, the proposed cuts include slashing $40 million in funding from the Centers for Disease Control HIV/AIDS prevention programs, as well as cutting $24 million in federal housing programs for persons living with HIV/AIDS. Similar to other legislation proposed by the Trump administration, these cuts send a clear message of Trump’s utter disregard for LGBTQ Americans. Some analysts believe that Trump’s actions could contribute to nearly 300,000 deaths globally.

“It’s all part of Trump’s attacks on marginalized communities … He picked a vice president with a negative LGBTQ record, and now, looking at his proposed cuts [to HIV/AIDS programs] ― two years in a row ― it’s indicative of a White House that has done negative things to both the queer and African-American community, over and over again,” Alex Morash, public relations director at the National LGBTQ Task Force advocacy group, told HuffPost on Wednesday.

Although significant strides have been made in recent years towards the fight against HIV/AIDS, the CDC estimates that nearly 1 million Americans currently live with HIV/AIDS. This pales in comparison to the 36.7 million people globally who live with HIV/AIDS. The virus disproportionately affects more LGBTQ individuals and people of color. In addition to the aforementioned cuts, the 2019 fiscal budget proposal also includes an $800 million cut to global AIDS funding.

“The United States has been a leader in the fight to end the AIDS epidemic around the world and these programs are vital to the health of millions around the world,” David Stacy, Government Affairs Director at the Human Rights Campaign, told the Daily Beast. “The Trump-Pence Administration is abandoning a bipartisan effort that Presidents Bush and Obama championed. Cutting essential funding for these life-saving services jeopardizes not only LGTBQ people but significantly undermines the overall health infrastructure in these countries.”

Just over 30 years ago, the world was embroiled in in an AIDS epidemic. The disease was relatively unknown and effective treatments were scarce.  Millions of people died as a result of the disease, and the government response, under the Reagan administration, was negligible at best. Initially misappropriated as a “gay disease,” HIV/AIDS has since been proven to affect individuals from all walks of life. Since the epidemic of the ‘80s and ‘90s, tremendous scientific advancements have been made in an effort to eradicate HIV/AIDS.  Medications have dramatically improved, which has both increased life expectancy and quality of life.

However, stigma still exists. Even today, the cultural narrative suggests that individuals living with HIV/AIDS are somehow “dirty” or infected with the virus due to poor personal choices. Such toxic beliefs counter the scientific and societal advancements made in the fight to truly eradicate HIV/AIDS. Again, Trump’s proposed budget cuts serve as a direct message that individuals living with HIV/AIDS are not important, thereby marginalizing yet another group of Americans. The message is clear — if you are not a white, straight, conservative American, then the president does not care. For many persons, such as Danny Carroll, living with HIV is still compounded with stigma:

I was in the closet, all this time, because of what I thought having HIV would say about me. And this is not an excuse. That realization alone proved that I had never listened to the lessons I had been taught. That understanding should have been innate, should have been instantaneous, but it was not; that is stigma. The longer we wallow in fear for our identity, the harder it becomes for the people who truly need support and attention to get the attention they desperately need, namely the long term survivors still dealing with the aftermath of their battle with the virus, and the unprivileged multitudes in this country without access to the healthcare programs necessary to allow them to easily do what I, and many more, have done. We need to change the logline. Our message is stilted: we tell the people who have already caught the virus, already seroconverted, that they’ll be fine, and yet revile the idea of telling a healthy person that they’ll be fine if they catch HIV. The ‘no big deal’” problem. The urgency of prevention is still painted with the idea that HIV is the most awful thing you could catch, which is a simple and effective message, I understand that, much more simple than the idea that prevention is about the wider arc of the virus and creating a human barrier to corral and control the pandemic. We throw so much attention at personal prevention that when prevention fails it feels like a loss, like a major failure of character rather than an encounter with a monumental force of nature. Should it then be any surprise that our newly diagnosed still suffer such massive depressions with that sort of message circling our culture? People are still doubtful that I am healthy, that a person with HIV can qualify perfectly as such.

HIV/AIDS is a public health issue, and Trump’s actions reinforce the stigma that Carroll articulates. Although mortality rates from HIV/AIDS have dropped precipitously in recent years, it still impacts millions of people. Trump, as well as our government, have a responsibility to support the funding of HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and housing programs until the virus has truly been erased.

According to the Huffington Post, Trump’s support is actually crucial in combating HIV/AIDS.  Although HIV/AIDS is much more treatable than it was 30 years ago, a commitment is required to truly eradicate the virus. Confronting bias, stigma and discrimination is crucial, and action-based practices such as funding stable housing and providing comprehensive health care are of paramount importance. The federal government is responsible for ensuring the civil rights and quality of life for this vulnerable population.

Thankfully, similar proposed cuts were rejected by Congress last year. Hopefully, they will once again be rejected, as lives are literally on the line.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less