Poll Shows Support For Gun Safety Laws at a New High After Texas Shooting

Las Vegas and Texas mass shootings aftermath

After several mass shootings in a row, the latest Quinnipiac University poll shows a sharp increase in national support for universal background checks for gun purchases, including among gun owners. The poll also found that a majority of voters support “a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons’’.

The new findings show the highest level of support for checks since Quinnipiac started polling on the issue after the Sandy Hook School shootings in Newtown that killed 20 children and six educators in December 2012. The nationwide poll took place Nov. 7-13 with a margin of error of + or - 3%.

The latest numbers show 95% support for universal background checks, including 94% in households with gun ownership. Support for criminal background checks cuts across all groups: 98% of Democrats, 96% of independents, 92% of Republicans, 97% of women and 92% of men.

A bipartisan group of senators introduced legislation today to ensure federal and state authorities comply with existing law and accurately report individuals’ criminal histories to a system used for background checks ahead of gun purchases. The proposal follows the killing of 26 people, 14 of them children, during a Sunday service earlier this month at a Baptist church in the small Texas town of Sutherland Springs and the massacre of 58 people and injuries to hundreds more at a country music festival in Las Vegas last month.

The bill, crafted by Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas and Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut as well as Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Cali.), would provide incentives to states to strengthen the National Instant Criminal Background Check system to ensure timely, accurate uploading of all background check information.

The Quinnipiac poll found voters also support “a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons’’ 65% to 31%. In gun households, voters support a ban 51% to 43%. 91% support banning the sale of guns to people convicted of a violent crime.

74% support banning gun modifications that make a firearm shoot like a fully automatic weapon with 24% opposed. Highest support for banning so-called “bump stocks’’ comes from the Northeast and suburbs at 81% each.

Nearly 60% surveyed consider it too easy to buy a gun in the United States. But only 32% of Republicans said it was “too easy’’ while 59% of Republicans said it is “about right.’’

At the same time, 62% said criminals responsible for mass shootings “would find a way around gun laws and commit these crimes, anyway’’ under stricter gun laws. By comparison, 34% said stricter gun laws would help prevent massacres like those at a recent concert in Las Vegas and a church in Texas. The political divide was sharp at 92% of Republicans claiming criminals find a way around laws, while only 38% of Democrats agreed.

Regarding the causes of mass shootings, 52% cited lack of mental health care as the biggest reason, while only 37% cited the ability to buy guns. Overall, 74% of Republicans, 55% of men, and 58% of those between the ages of 35 and 49 called it too difficult to get mental health care.

When asked if the United States would be safer if more people carried guns, 37% said safer and 55% said less safe. Among those 65 and older, 61% said less safe.

With each American gun massacre, there is stronger support for tighter gun control measures.’’

“But the cynical view prevails," said Tim Malloy, the poll’s assistant director, "stricter laws will do no good whatsoever in a country with more guns than people.’’


Late last year, the House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump on two articles:

  • Abuse of Power
  • Obstruction of Congress

Trump's allies have railed against both articles, but the obstruction of Congress charge has come under particular focus.

During its initial investigation, the House committees overseeing impeachment requested documents and witnesses from the White House, the State Department, and the Office of Management and Budget that would help get to the bottom of just what the deal was with Ukraine's foreign policy.

When they denied the House's request, the House subpoenaed the departments for the evidence. Claiming executive privilege, their subpoenas went ignored.

Keep reading...
CNN // David Corio/Redferns via Getty Images

House Impeachment Managers and President Donald Trump's defense team debated the rules for the ongoing impeachment trial in the Senate. The proceedings lasted for 13 hours and went on until around 2 o'clock in the morning.

Hours into the debate, Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) responded to a rhetorical question from Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, who had asked "Why are we here?"

It led to a mic drop moment for Jeffries.

Keep reading...
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This past December, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing where it heard from constitutional scholars and legal experts as to whether President Donald Trump's pressure on Ukraine to open politically beneficial investigations warranted impeachment.

House Democrats brought forth three witnesses who argued in favor of impeachment, and House Republicans brought one: George Washington University's public interest law chair, Jonathan Turley.

Keep reading...
PBS News Hour/YouTube

The White House Counsel is a staff appointee of the President and Vice President of the United States. Their role is to advise the President on all legal issues concerning the President and their administration.

Pat Cipollone has served as the current White House Counsel for President Donald Trump since December 2018.

Keep reading...
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

In the current political landscape of the United States, you'd be hard-pressed to find any issue that Americans on which both sides of the ideological spectrum agree.

But it turns out that even on an issue as divisive as the impeachment of President Donald Trump, Republicans and Democrats agree on something.

Keep reading...
ABC News

President Donald Trump's impeachment trial began in earnest in the Senate on Tuesday afternoon.

Shortly after House impeachment manager, Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA), laid out the evidence against the President unveiled by House Democrats, one of Trump's defense attorneys—Jay Sekulow—asked a question in his rebuttal.

Keep reading...