Attorney General Jeff Sessions is under fire early Friday after a dismissive remark toward the state of Hawaii during an interview on “The Mark Levin Show,” a conservative talk radio program.
His remarks were aimed at a Federal District Court ruling last month blocking the Trump administration’s travel ban on travelers from six Muslim-majority nations. The court had issued its ruling after the District Court in Seattle halted President Trump’s initial travel ban, which was wider in scope.
Sessions offered an unusual criticism: “I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the president of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power.”
Judge Derrick K. Watson, of the Federal District Court in Honolulu, had concluded that any “reasonable, objective observer” would view even the new version of the order as “issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion, in spite of its stated, religiously neutral purpose.”
At the time, Trump leveled criticism toward Judge Watson, accusing him of acting “for political reasons.”
Sessions’ apparent dismissal of the entire state of Hawaii has drawn strong rebukes for invoking both colonialism and latent racism. Many were quick to point out that Hawaii has been a state since 1959. Furthermore, Judge Watson, who was confirmed by 93 senators including Sessions, is a federal judge serving the district of Hawaii and not simply a “Hawaiian” judge. Under the law, the state or district in which Judge Watson was sitting when he made his ruling is unrelated to scope or effect of the judgment. As the nation’s chief law enforcement officer, Attorney General Sessions is expected to know and understand this.
To read more, please continue to page 2.