The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to ban a pesticide called chlorpyrifos, which has been linked to brain damage in children.
EPA under Scott Pruitt broke the law by ignoring the conclusions of agency scientists to reverse Obama-era regulations, court rules. https://t.co/xefioeq0FC
— NBC News (@NBCNews) August 9, 2018
New York’s Attorney General Barbara Underwood praised the ruling in a Twitter post, calling it a “major court victory.” The ban was initially recommended by E.P.A scientists under President Barack Obama, whose administration fought diligently for pro-environmental policies.
Studies have shown that kids are so harmed by exposure to chlorpyrifos that their brain structure changes and their IQ is impacted.
— NY AG Underwood (@NewYorkStateAG) August 9, 2018
In March 2017, Pruitt rejected the findings of the E.P.A.’s own scientists, who in 2016 found that children and infants who had been exposed to chlorpyrifos when used as an insecticide in their homes had “measurable volumetric changes in the cerebral cortex.”
In its 2-1 decision, the three-judge panel gave the E.P.A. two months to implement the ban.
Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York authored the majority opinion, stating that the EPA violated the law saying there was
“no justification for the E.P.A.’s decision in its 2017 order to maintain a tolerance for chlorpyrifos in the face of scientific evidence that its residue on food causes neurodevelopmental damage to children.”
The ruling strikes a significant blow to President Donald Trump and former E.P.A. Administrator Scott Pruitt, who resigned last month amid a mountain of growing scandals.
The E.P.A. has not publicly shared how it plans on responding to the ruling.
“E.P.A. is reviewing the decision,” said Michael Abboud, an agency spokesman. “The Columbia center’s data underlying the court’s assumptions remains inaccessible and has hindered the agency’s ongoing process to fully evaluate the pesticide using the best available, transparent science.”
The court said that in his refusal to ban chlorpyrifos, Pruitt violated the law.
Twitter thinks Pruitt should be held accountable.
Thank you! Now charge him with this crime!
— tracy richards (@TracyRichards00) August 9, 2018
Prosecute Scott Pruitt for endangering children.
— Rich Madrid (@Richmadrid11) August 9, 2018
Because the pie hole running the EPA had no fricken clue about what he was doing… just another rich friend of Trumpet
— Jorge Varona (@cyclingcubano) August 9, 2018
— bulls on parade (@marketlongs) August 9, 2018
— Brian Lang (@BrianLangAuthor) August 9, 2018
“The panel held that there was no justification for the EPA’s decision in its 2017 order to maintain a tolerance for chlorpyrifos in the face of scientific evidence that its residue on food causes neurodevelopmental damage to children,” Appeals Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff wrote in the majority decision.