Donald Trump Just Shared a Glowing Letter He Got From Kim Jong Un, and It Sounds Just Like Trump Wrote It

(Photos by Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump stated during his campaign run, and after, that he was "non-braggadocious." But Trump's use of language laden with superlatives is well documented.

Most, best, biggest and other such grandiose terms describing his own accomplishments dot all of the President's speeches and tweets. On Tuesday, the President tweeted, according to an unnamed and unlinked poll, he was "the most popular Republican in the history of the Party."

Two of the four Presidents on Mount Rushmore are Republicans. According to Trump's tweet however he surpassed the popularity of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt.

So when the President shared a letter sent in Korean from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as well as an official White House translation, people noticed certain aspects of the language in the English translation transcript.

The letter, according to the official White House translation, refers to the President as "Your Excellency" five times, capitalized each time. The letter is only four sentences long.

Official White House translation of letter from Kim Jong Un to Donald Trump. As of this writing, no independent translation has been published. (Twitter)

The full transcript of the body of the letter, seen below, contains a wealth of superlatives and praise. But how much is lost in translation? Or is there another reason for the language choices?

The significant first meeting with Your Excellency and the joint statement that we signed together in Singapore 24 days ago was indeed the start of a meaningful journey. I deeply appreciate the energetic and extraordinary efforts made by Your Excellency Mr. President for the improvement of relations between the two countries and the faithful implementation of the joint statement. I firmly believe that the strong will, sincere efforts and unique approach of myself and Your Excellency Mr. President aimed at opening up a new future between the DPRK and the U.S. will surely come to fruition. Wishing that the invariable trust and confidence in Your Excellency Mr. President will be further strengthened in the future process of taking practical actions, I extend my conviction that the epochal process in promoting DPRK-U.S. relations will bring our next meeting forward."

For example, the header shows "H.E. Donald J. Trump", for "His Excellency Donald J. Trump". Is the use of Your Excellency simply meant as "Sir?"

While American English tends to employ more generic formal address, such as Sir or Madam, other languages have levels of social status included in their formal address. The Sir used for a colleague is not the same as the Sir used for your boss.

But while the terms may have originally drawn from aristocracy, their use in the modern world is synonymous with the generic Sir or Madam of Americanized English. No one is calling their boss "Your Royal Highness" or "Your Excellency."

It's possible the intent of the use in Kim's letter was not to refer to the President as Your Excellency, but rather as simply a "Sir" of higher status.

Or, it is possible the use is a deliberate attempt to flatter a leader who once praised Kim for how the people of North Korea defer to him. False praise and flattery, meant to distract from real actions?

The letter from Kim was released by Trump three days after he made a promise of cooperation from Kim on Twitter. This promise came after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's recent visit to North Korea was criticized for failing to accomplish anything. In the tweet, Trump blames China.

The June North Korea-United States summit had already received heavy criticism for failing to bring any new concessions from North Korea, who has promised to denuclearize for years, while making several concessions to Kim. Since the summit, reports have emerged that North Korea is increasing their nuclear program after the declaration signed by Kim and Trump.

While the release of a letter, full of optimism and praise, after the heavily criticized Pompeo meetings may seem like a win, the North Korean letter is dated before Pompeo met with his North Korean counterpart, Kim Yong Chol.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un skipped the meetings entirely, choosing to visit a potato farm instead. And after the meetings, the North Korean government issued a statement calling the U.S. attempts at dialogue “regrettable,” “gangster-like” and “cancerous.”

Despite the letter predating the Pompeo trip, the President says, "A very nice note from Chairman Kim of North Korea. Great progress being made!"

As with other wins boasted of on social media, this letter may also not belong in the Trump administration win column.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less