The term coup is not one that has applied in the United States since the Revolutionary War period. While the US history books may refer to the creation of the USA as a revolution, the British Empire could have called it a coup.
There was no legal method of removing the British from power in the colonial era and the word coup means:
“a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government”
And therein lies the sticking point for a recent accusation by Republican Representative Lance Gooden of Texas against Chair of the House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler of New York. Gooden claims Democrat Nadler is attempting a coup and must be stopped.
On Tuesday, GOP member Gooden introduced a measure to remove Jerry Nadler as the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee.
Freshman Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) just introduced a resolution to remove House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) from his role as the top Democrat on the panel responsible for handling impeachment proceedings. https://t.co/4NsszeMHsP
— Amee Vanderpool (@girlsreallyrule) September 24, 2019
Killing the messenger.
— Bob Smith (@RCSmithNYC) September 24, 2019
“By law, he may not launch impeachment proceedings until the full House votes for him to do so. This attempted coup against a duly-elected, sitting president is unprecedented and must be stopped.”
“I urge the Majority to move immediately to have him stripped of his chairmanship and that any accomplices on the Judiciary Committee not be considered as a replacement.”
While Trump supporters have bandied the word coup about for some time in regards to the many investigations into the now dissolved Trump Foundation charity, Trump University, impropriety by since resigned members of the Trump administration, indicted and convicted Trump campaign members and foreign interference in the 2016 election, do they have a valid case.
As defined, Nadler’s Judiciary Committee inquiries into more potential impropriety by the Trump administration—obstruction of justice this time—falls far short of the definition of a coup. While not all coups are violent, they are sudden—the last two plus years fails to be a sudden occurrence—and illegal.
It is the question of legality upon which Gooden rests his hopes to remove Nadler. Freshman Representative Gooden—a University of Austin graduate with a BA in government—is putting his knowledge of constitutional law up against Jerry Nadler, a graduate of Columbia University with a law degree from Fordham University and 42 years experience in state and federal government, including during the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.
As with GOP outcry over the Justice Department’s duly appointed Special Counsel, dislike of the law or provisions of the US Constitution does not nullify either. As many times as President Trump and his supporters claimed investigations into the proven interference and other crimes by Russian assets and members of the Trump campaign were illegal or a witch hunt, legally and constitutionally they were not.
Just as the House Judiciary Committee investigating possible obstruction of justice to see if an impeachment is warranted is neither a coup or an actual impeachment.
For the question of country over party, or even party over President Trump, people felt Gooden’s devotion lay solely with the President.
He’s 100% TRUMPBOT
— Alison L. Dunn ♥️ (@AlisonDunn13) September 24, 2019
WTF? Maybe it’s time for Lance to do as his fellow Texans have done – hang it up. First term notwithstanding.
— Paul NC72 (@paul_nc72) September 24, 2019
I suggest Rep. Lance Golden do what 5 other members from Texas have done just QUIT, or grow a spine. You are backing a criminal, check the Constitution that is what you are suppose to protect, not a narcissist and a baby! Nadler will eat you for lunch!
— Michael McCarthy (@azmichael1976) September 24, 2019
They are running scared and trying with extreme desperation to pull out all the stops. Sorry guys, you’re on a runaway train about to crash. I’d get off of it if I were you.
— Cherfan4ever🆘🌎🕊💕🦋 (@Cherfan4ever1) September 24, 2019
Didn’t he just have hearings? To gather info to give to the full House to vote on to begin the actual proceedings? Are Rs that willing to defend/protect Trump instead of upholding and defending the Constitution? @Lancegooden
— madi (@demo_tape95) September 24, 2019
Many called on Texans to remove Gooden instead.
Texas you need to start following Gooden he is becoming an embarrassment for Texas and https://t.co/ddAM4ufBwV him out in 2020 and put someone in who puts Texas and country before himself.
— Valerie Castronovo (@ValerieCastron2) September 24, 2019
🙄Again the elected GOP officials in my state…are the most embarrassing bunch of partison yahoos to ever hold office.
— Liberal Texan 🌊🌊🌊#Resist (@FREAKINWOKE) September 24, 2019
Gooden wants to remove Nadler but all the while Goodwin is protecting the traitor of our Country in the WH! How stupid are these Republicans???? Trumpy really could shoot someone in front of them & they wouldn’t admit that he did it!!!!!
— Helen Self (@Helens31Self) September 24, 2019
While one person had advice for what might work better than Gooden’s measure to remove Nadler for a coup.
If they’re going to slow down the impeachment process, Congressional Republicans will need to do more than lame resolutions standing no chance of passing. Maybe they should all fake seizures during the impeachment hearings.https://t.co/4KzvZut20y
— B Koplow (@bmkoplow5) September 24, 2019
While the GOP minority in the House supported Gooden’s measure, the Democratic majority held a meeting at 4:00pm Tuesday to decide how to proceed based on the recent congressional hearings as well as new information about the President pressuring a foreign government to help him gain an advantage over a political rival. It was announced a formal impeachment inquiry would commence.
Listen to the first season of George Takei’s podcast, ‘Oh Myyy Pod!‘ where we explore the racially charged videos that have taken the internet by storm.
Be sure to subscribe here and never miss an episode.