After Elizabeth Warren Called Out Amazon For Paying Zero In Taxes, Their Response Just Proved Her Point

Ethan Miller/Getty Images and Lionel Bonaventure/AFP/Getty Images)

In a Thursday blog post, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts outlined a plan to close corporate tax loopholes so multi-billion dollar companies cannot use existing tax law to pay $0 in federal taxes. One of the companies she cited by name was Amazon.

But Amazon had a response for the 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful.


The company issued an official statement.

"Amazon pays all the taxes we are required to pay in the U.S. and every country where we operate."

Amazon official statement (@eschor/Twitter)

But Warren also had a response ready.

In her blog, Warren wrote:

"...our corporate tax code is so littered with loopholes that simply raising the regular corporate tax rate alone is not enough."

Of her proposed plan, the Real Corporate Profits Tax, she stated:

"It will make our biggest and most profitable corporations pay more and ensure that none of them can ever make billions and pay zero taxes again."

But how much of a problem is this?

Under President Donald Trump and the GOP's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, twice as many companies are paying no federal taxes. The number went from 30 to 60, so far, which may seem like a small number.

However the amount of money is not small.

According to the bipartisan, non-profit Center for Public Integrity and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP):

"[The companies were] able to zero out their federal income taxes on $79 billion in U.S. pretax income."
"Instead of paying $16.4 billion in taxes, as the new 21 percent corporate tax rate requires, these companies enjoyed a net corporate tax rebate of $4.3 billion, blowing a $20.7 billion hole in the federal budget last year."

In addition to dropping the corporate tax rate in their new GOP tax plan—pushed through Congress by former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell while the Republicans still controlled both houses—it also "lowers the bar for the amount of tax avoidance it takes to get you down to zero" per Matthew Gardner, an ITEP senior fellow and lead author of the report.

Gardner added:

"The specter of big corporations avoiding all income taxes on billions in profits sends a strong and corrosive signal to Americans: that the tax system is stacked against them, in favor of corporations and the wealthiest Americans."

And many agreed with his assessment.

Despite GOP claims that such tax breaks for the most profitable corporations and wealthiest individuals in the United States would lead to higher wages and benefits, working people are not seeing it in their paychecks.

But someone asked an important question about Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

"how do "modest profits" spin out the world's richest person? how much do their low wage workers get subsidized by federal programs? such bunk of a statement......."

Amazon has yet to release another response to Senator Warren.

C-SPAN

Late last year, the House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump on two articles:

  • Abuse of Power
  • Obstruction of Congress

Trump's allies have railed against both articles, but the obstruction of Congress charge has come under particular focus.

During its initial investigation, the House committees overseeing impeachment requested documents and witnesses from the White House, the State Department, and the Office of Management and Budget that would help get to the bottom of just what the deal was with Ukraine's foreign policy.

When they denied the House's request, the House subpoenaed the departments for the evidence. Claiming executive privilege, their subpoenas went ignored.

Keep reading...
CNN // David Corio/Redferns via Getty Images

House Impeachment Managers and President Donald Trump's defense team debated the rules for the ongoing impeachment trial in the Senate. The proceedings lasted for 13 hours and went on until around 2 o'clock in the morning.

Hours into the debate, Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) responded to a rhetorical question from Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, who had asked "Why are we here?"

It led to a mic drop moment for Jeffries.

Keep reading...
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This past December, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing where it heard from constitutional scholars and legal experts as to whether President Donald Trump's pressure on Ukraine to open politically beneficial investigations warranted impeachment.

House Democrats brought forth three witnesses who argued in favor of impeachment, and House Republicans brought one: George Washington University's public interest law chair, Jonathan Turley.

Keep reading...
PBS News Hour/YouTube

The White House Counsel is a staff appointee of the President and Vice President of the United States. Their role is to advise the President on all legal issues concerning the President and their administration.

Pat Cipollone has served as the current White House Counsel for President Donald Trump since December 2018.

Keep reading...
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

In the current political landscape of the United States, you'd be hard-pressed to find any issue that Americans on which both sides of the ideological spectrum agree.

But it turns out that even on an issue as divisive as the impeachment of President Donald Trump, Republicans and Democrats agree on something.

Keep reading...
ABC News

President Donald Trump's impeachment trial began in earnest in the Senate on Tuesday afternoon.

Shortly after House impeachment manager, Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA), laid out the evidence against the President unveiled by House Democrats, one of Trump's defense attorneys—Jay Sekulow—asked a question in his rebuttal.

Keep reading...