Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper Both Ask Why Sarah Sanders Can Not Guarantee Her Boss' Twitter Claim

White House briefing August 14, 2018 (CNN)

Several anchors at CNN—a favored target of President Donald Trump in his attacks on the media—found themselves wondering at the response of White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders to questions about her boss during Tuesday's press briefing. When asked to guarantee no Trump n-word tapes would surface, Sanders would not.

But Trump stated on Twitter Monday night, the n-word never passed his lips in the entirety of his life as it is not in his vocabulary.

I don’t have that word in my vocabulary, and never have."

As her boss leaves no doubt to the possibility of any tape ever surfacing, CNN host Jake Tapper on The Lead and Anderson Cooper on Anderson Cooper 360 both asked why Sanders could not guarantee no tape will someday surface.

During the White House press briefing Tuesday, NBC's Kristen Welker asks Trump's press secretary if she asked the President about the possibility of tapes or if he said the n-word. Each time, Sanders demurred stating since the President already addressed the question on Twitter, it made her asking him unnecessary.

That adherence to her standard response—'the President already addressed that'—matched prior press briefings as a review on Anderson Cooper 360 showed. But then Sanders went off script for Welker's final question.

The NBC reporter asked:

Can you stand at the podium and guarantee the American people they’ll never hear Donald Trump utter the ‘N-word’ on a recording, in any context?"

This time, Sanders offered two disclaimers in her responses.

First she stated:

I can't guarantee anything. I can tell you the President addressed this question directly. I can tell you that I've never heard him use that term or anything similar."

Welker noticed and followed up with, "Just to be clear, you can't guarantee it?"

To which Sanders responded:

Look, I haven’t been in every single room."

Sanders then repeated her usual standard response of 'the President already addressed that.'

Watch the Jake Tapper The Lead segment featuring the exchange here:

After watching the press briefing clip, Tapper remarked:

I mean, that's pretty stunning. First of all, I'm not sure why today of all days she decided that lying was something she wasn’t willing to do so kudos to her for the truth on that.
But the idea that you can’t make that guarantee... Why can’t you make that guarantee?"

The Lead panelist Karine Jean-Pierre, a senior advisor with MoveOn.org answered Tapper stating:

Because anyone who's been paying attention knows that, uh...Well basically if you don’t know that Donald Trump is a racist then you haven’t been paying attention. So even she knows she cannot categorically say that Donald Trump is not a racist and also just look at his Twitter!"

Later Tuesday, CNN host Anderson Cooper stated much the same things as Tapper and his panelists before him. On Anderson Cooper 360, the CNN host made the following statement:

The President’s tweet seems pretty definitive, at least definitive enough for his press secretary to give it the kind of definitive statement like these she’s repeated for past presidential tweets."

Cooper then played a number of clips where Sanders took a response by Trump as the final word on a matter and proof positive. So why not this time?

Why then add the statement, 'Look, I haven't been in every single room'? Does Sanders know or at least think a tape exists?

Or is Sanders finally engaging in some self-preservation?

The White House Press Secretary routinely receives heavy criticism for false statements made behind the podium in the White House briefing room. And maybe unfairly as she did not create the lie, she only repeats it.

But pundits and the public alike point out each time she repeats the claims of her boss or another member of the Trump administration only to have those claims backtracked or contradicted by the President, Rudy Giuliani or the truth made public.

Sanders famously once said, in a response to why she repeated an easily debunked lie, that she only gave the best information she had at the time. Has even she grown wearing of such excuses or the consequences of making repeated false statements publicly like being asked to leave a restaurant?

Is this Sanders turning over a new leaf in general—only guaranteeing claims she personally knows are true—or is this only because of the subject of the discussion—racism and the use of the n-word by a powerful White man.

Racism often holds the position in the United States as the elephant in the room. Everyone sees it, but no one wants to discuss it or even acknowledge it.

Only Sarah Huckabee Sanders knows for certain why she chose to give herself wiggle room on Trump's use of the n-word. As for the fallout for her less than ringing endorsement of her boss, that remains to be seen as well.


Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less
gbuck_jr/Twitter; National Archives

The Republican Party again raised ire and eyebrows with yet another GOP candidate advocating violence against members of Congress in official campaign materials.

This time it is George Buck Jr. of Florida. The GOP politician is running for the 13th congressional district—a seat currently held by Democrat Charlie Crist.

Keep reading... Show less
Win McNamee/Getty Images // Hogan Gidley/Twitter

President Donald Trump's press team is working overtime to discredit media coverage of the impeachment hearings against their boss.

The House Judiciary Committee began its hearings today, with four constitutional scholars—Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman, and Jonathan Turley—tasked with testifying about the constitutionality of impeaching Donald Trump. The former three were invited by Democrats, who hold the majority, while Turley was invited by Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less

The House Intelligence Committee submitted to the House Judiciary Committee its 300 page report of information gleaned from fact witnesses so far in the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

In addition to reiterating the testimony of several witnesses regarding Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine, the report also highlighted call records between numerous key players in the Ukraine scandal.

Keep reading... Show less