Budget Deal Just Reached Is Big Blow to Trump Programs

BUDGET AGREEMENT DIGEST: CNN, Fox News, CNN

After passing a one-week stopgap funding bill on Friday, Congress has reached a bipartisan agreement to fund the government through September.


This $1.07 trillion deal, if passed through Congress, would serve as a rebuke to the dealmaker-in-chief, who has been vocal in his policy priorities even as his party negotiates away the very funding that might make them a reality.

While the deal does increase funding for the Pentagon and for border security by billions of dollars, it does not address several of Trump’s key initiatives:

  • no funding for the border wall
  • no money for a deportation force
  • no cuts to sanctuary cities
  • no cuts to Planned Parenthood funding
  • no cuts to Obamacare subsidies

Democrats wasted no time praising this agreement.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement: "The bill ensures taxpayer dollars aren't used to fund an ineffective border wall, excludes poison pill riders, and increases investments in programs that the middle class relies on, like medical research, education and infrastructure."

Credit: Source.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, added: “we have made significant progress improving the omnibus bill...[It] does not fund President Trump's immoral and unwise border wall or create a cruel new deportation force.”

In addition, the budget agreement increases funding for the National Institute of Health by $2 billion, which is in stark contrast to President Trump's own budget blueprint he released in March, which would have cut the NIH by $6 billion.

Other Democratic priorities, such as funding for clean energy programs, infrastructure grants, $295 for Puerto Rico Medicaid, Pell grants, and a permanent fix for miners' health insurance were also included.

Congress is expected to vote on this bill later this week. A new funding bill must pass before 11:59pm on Friday, May 5, to avoid a government shutdown.

Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The Senate undertook one of the gravest American political processes on Tuesday when the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump began in earnest as House Managers and Trump's defense team debated to set the rules for the ensuing trial.

On Wednesday, the Democratic impeachment managers began their 24 allotted hours (set over the course of three days) to make their case against Trump. They've cited documents, videos, and Trump's own words to create a compelling case for the removal of the President—or at least for hearing the evidence he's repeatedly blocked from coming to light.

But are Republican Senators listening?

Keep reading...
C-SPAN

Late last year, the House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump on two articles:

  • Abuse of Power
  • Obstruction of Congress

Trump's allies have railed against both articles, but the obstruction of Congress charge has come under particular focus.

During its initial investigation, the House committees overseeing impeachment requested documents and witnesses from the White House, the State Department, and the Office of Management and Budget that would help get to the bottom of just what the deal was with Ukraine's foreign policy.

When they denied the House's request, the House subpoenaed the departments for the evidence. Claiming executive privilege, their subpoenas went ignored.

Keep reading...
CNN // David Corio/Redferns via Getty Images

House Impeachment Managers and President Donald Trump's defense team debated the rules for the ongoing impeachment trial in the Senate. The proceedings lasted for 13 hours and went on until around 2 o'clock in the morning.

Hours into the debate, Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) responded to a rhetorical question from Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, who had asked "Why are we here?"

It led to a mic drop moment for Jeffries.

Keep reading...
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This past December, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing where it heard from constitutional scholars and legal experts as to whether President Donald Trump's pressure on Ukraine to open politically beneficial investigations warranted impeachment.

House Democrats brought forth three witnesses who argued in favor of impeachment, and House Republicans brought one: George Washington University's public interest law chair, Jonathan Turley.

Keep reading...
PBS News Hour/YouTube

The White House Counsel is a staff appointee of the President and Vice President of the United States. Their role is to advise the President on all legal issues concerning the President and their administration.

Pat Cipollone has served as the current White House Counsel for President Donald Trump since December 2018.

Keep reading...
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

In the current political landscape of the United States, you'd be hard-pressed to find any issue that Americans on which both sides of the ideological spectrum agree.

But it turns out that even on an issue as divisive as the impeachment of President Donald Trump, Republicans and Democrats agree on something.

Keep reading...