Most Read

Trump Unveils New Defense of His Call With the Ukrainian President: Ukraine Didn't Know About the Quid Pro Quo

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence attend a meeting on religious freedom at United Nations headquarters on September 23, 2019 in New York City. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Career diplomat and acting Ambassador to Ukraine, William Taylor, gave an explosive closed door testimony to the committees overseeing the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning.

By Tuesday afternoon, Taylor's 15 page opening statement had leaked, and it repeatedly confirms that the Trump administration withheld pre-approved military assistance from Ukraine on the condition that Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, publicly announce an investigation into Trump's potential 2020 opponent, Vice President Joe Biden.


In other words: the Trump Administration gave a quid pro quo (military assistance for political dirt) to Ukrainian leadership, flying in the face of the Republican talking point that Trump gave no such quid pro quo in the rough transcript of the July 25 call with Zelenskyy that spurred the inquiry.

In full spin mode, Trump took to Twitter to quote Congressman John Ratcliffe, who let loose a whole new argument about the quid pro quo, that Trump was eager to amplify:

That the Ukrainians were not "aware that military aid was being withheld" at the time of Trump's call with Zelensky.

It's an echo of an argument that none other than Sean Hannity made on his show Tuesday night, stating:

"During the call, the government of Ukraine had no idea the U.S. had temporarily delayed aid."

You can watch it at 10:34 below:

No matter how many times they repeat the talking point, it doesn't make it true.

The hold on the assistance began in July and didn't end until September.

According to Taylor's testimony, the Ukrainians—who rely on foreign military assistance to preserve their democracy from Russian aggression—definitely knew the aid was being withheld.

Most damningly, Ambassador to the EU, Gordon Sondland, explicitly gave Zelensky a quid pro quo.

"Ambassador Sondland said that he had talked to President Zelensky and [Ukrainian Presidential Advisor Andriy] Yermak and told them that, although this was not a quid pro quo, if President Zelensky did not 'clear things up' in public, we would be at a 'stalemate.' I understood a “stalemate” to mean that Ukraine would not receive the much-needed military assistance."

Sondland may have said his ultimatum was no quid pro quo, but in reality, it's the definition of one.

Taylor asserted throughout the opening testimony that Ukrainians knew crucial military aid was on the line.

"[On] August 29, Yermak contacted me and was very concerned, asking about the withheld security assistance. The hold that the White House had placed on the assistance had just been made public that day in a Politico story. At that point, I was embarrassed that I could give him no explanation for why it was withheld."

After learning of the hold on aid, they soon learned the reason.

"[EU Ambassador Gordon] Sondland told Mr. Yermak that the security assistance money would not come until President Zelenskyy committed to pursue the Burisma investigation. I was alarmed by what Mr. Morrison told me about the Sondland-Yermak conversation. This was the first time I had heard that the security assistance—not just the White House meeting—was conditioned on the investigations."

President Zelenskyy asked about the withheld assistance directly.

"On September 5, I hosted Senators Johnson and Murphy for a visit to Kyiv. During their visit, we met with President Zelenskyy. His first question to the senators was about the withheld security assistance."

So Trump's assertion that Ukrainians didn't know military assistance was being withheld, so there couldn't have been a quid pro quo is yet another falsehood to add to the President's 13,435 piece collection.

Some took Trump's tweet to be an admission that there was a quid pro quo the entire time.

How many lies are we willing to accept from the President of the United States?