oh-myyy-ribbon

Betting Site That Asked People to Bet on How Many Lies Donald Trump Would Tell During His Oval Office Address Just Had to Pay Out Big Time

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers a televised address to the nation from his desk in the Oval Office about immigration and the southern U.S. border on the 18th day of a partial government shutdown at the White House in Washington, U.S., January 8, 2019. (REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Getty images)

President Donald Trump's propensity for near constant lying—an asset when he was a private businessman trying to appear more successful than his bottom line before investors and the public—paid off for people Tuesday night.

How could a President with a passing relationship with the truth pay off?


Betting website Bookmaker.eu allowed people to bet on how much Trump would lie during his presidential address from the White House's Oval Office Tuesday night. When presented with the wager of whether or not Trump would lie more or fewer than 3.5 times during his short speech, 92 percent of bettors chose more than 3.5 times.

And that turned out to be the winning bet.

According to their fact-checker—the bookmaker relied on The Washington Post—Trump lied six times during his approximately nine minute address. That's a little less than one untruth per minute.

While no one was surprised in the United States, the betting site based in the European Union underestimated the President's ability and frequency of telling lies and how many people would choose to bet on Trump telling many lies.

After all, several organizations dedicate at least part of their time to tracking what some refer to as the true Trump administration legacy: a President that lies every time he speaks to the public and the personnel who support and perpetuate his untruths.

The site will lose $276,424.

John Lester, odds consultant, stated:

"It's a bad day for Truthiness and Bookmaker. We knew we were in trouble early with this one."

He added why the site bet on making money with the President telling fewer rather than more lies.

"We figured the president's strategy going in would be a bit of fear mongering to create pressure on the Democrats to approve the funding of the wall (or barrier), however the president was also constrained by an approximate 8-minute time limit."

Bookmaker gambled on the President lying less due to the close scrutiny, but lost. Lester explained:

"With all the cable networks agreeing to air the speech, it came down to, how many times is the president willing to exaggerate the truth to accomplish his agenda, when he knows the world will be scrutinizing his every word?"

People's reactions to news of Bookmaker's losses due to the President's willingness to lie were also predictable.

People were disappointed they did not have a chance to bet on Trump's willingness to lie to people in the United States in a live telecast.

Others could not believe Bookmaker set the lies threshold so low.

And some characterized the President's behavior as childish.

But was there another motive for the speech?

Shortly after the speech aired, the Trump campaign sent out an email asking for donations.

Blaze TV

Continuing a steady slide to the right since her tenure as President Donald Trump's United Nations ambassador, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is under heat for recent comments regarding the Confederate flag.

The comments came during an interview with far-Right Blaze TV host Glenn Beck.

Keep reading... Show less
Fox News

Former Vice President and current 2020 Presidential candidate Joe Biden erupted at a man during an Iowa town hall who accused him of actively working to get his son Hunter a board position on the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. Biden called the man a "damn liar" before challenging him to pushups.

Republicans seized on the moment as an opportunity to discredit Biden as a candidate, but Fox and Friends cohost Ainsley Earhardt's reaction may be the most deluded yet.

Keep reading... Show less
Bryan Woolston/Getty Images // @parscale/Twitter

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has repeatedly made clear that, after President Donald Trump solicited Ukrainian leaders to announce investigations that personally benefitted him, the decision to launch impeachment proceedings wasn't a political maneuver, but a constitutional mandate.

The move came after years of Trump's supporters, as well as some critics, insisted that impeachment would be political suicide for the Democrats.

Since shortly after the inquiry's announcement in September, support for impeachment outweighed its oppositon as more revelations surfaced of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, but his 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale attempted to show that Pelosi's move to impeach would lose Democrats their House majority.

Keep reading... Show less
CNN

Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less