70 Years Later, The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Still Cause For Debate.

via Flickr user /kallu

Seventy years ago, on August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan; three days later, it dropped another on Nagasaki. Japan surrendered within a week, marking the end of the bloodiest war the world has ever known. But 70 years later, whether the United States made the right decision is still a point of bitter debate.

The human cost of the nuclear attack on Japan is almost unfathomable: approximately 200,000 people lost their lives. And yet, many continue to believe that the bombing was unavoidable.

Model of where the atomic bomb exploded on Hiroshima, Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. Via Flickr user José María Mateos

The now familiar narrative justifying the use of the atomic bombs alleges that President Truman’s decision to use the bomb was necessary to bring about Japan’s swift surrender and thereby save countless lives. Zachary Keck of The Diplomat points out, for instance, that the two nuclear attacks were an alternative to the U.S.’s plan to execute a massive ground invasion of Japan. According to Keck, “Operation Downfall” was expected to result in millions of casualties -- the vast majority of whom would have been Japanese.

The interview between radio host John Batchelor and author Charles Pellegrino discusses a "letter inside an encased measuring instrument dropped by a U.S. plane performing an observation role as Hiroshima was bombed, warning of additional bombs and calling on Japanese physicists to urge their leaders to stop the war."

Even if Operation Downfall had not been carried out as planned, it is possible that Japan would have suffered immeasurably at the hands of the Soviets, who entered the war in the Pacific on August 8, 1945. Keck points out that surrender would have been culturally unthinkable in Imperial Japan.

So, according to Keck, it is conceivable that “domestic politics and the need to save face would have compelled [Japan] to try and fight [the United States and the Soviet Union]

simultaneously for a while, though they knew the effort was futile.” The atomic disaster made it possible for Japanese leaders to consider surrender.

But there are many who take issue with this kind of speculation. In his article for The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, for example, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa argues that the bombings had less of an effect on the “emperor's sacred decision” to surrender than did the entry of the Soviet Union. Though Hasegawa acknowledges that the atomic bombs “injected a sense of urgency in finding an acceptable end to the war” and tipped the scales toward peace, he argues that the Soviet Union’s entry into the conflict “completely toppled the scale itself.”

Still others believe that Truman’s purpose may have been more about intimidating Soviet leadership than about the emperor of Japan. In his 1965 book titled Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam, Gar Alperovitz asserts that President Truman and then-Secretary of State James F. Byrnes carefully orchestrated the timing of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks as a direct “diplomatic offensive against the Soviet sphere in Eastern Europe, with the atomic bomb as an implicit but very obvious potential instrument.”

For many, it is hard to imagine any legitimate justification existing for the horrific pain and suffering the atomic bombs inflicted on Japanese civilians. Only about half of those who died as a result of the nuclear bombs did so on the day of the attack -- the rest slowly succumbed to their wounds and burns. Rupert Wingfield-Hayes of the BBC News reports that after the attack, survivors emerged from the ruins of their homes, skin peeling from their faces; rivers were clogged with the corpses of those who had desperately flocked there to escape the fires.

Even with the benefit of hindsight, it may not be possible to determine whether or how World War II would have ended had Hiroshima and Nagasaki been spared. What the bombings rendered clear, however, was the extent of suffering and destruction that could be caused by nuclear conflict. Whether or not President Truman’s actions were justified at the time, this solemn anniversary should serve as a reminder of the terrible consequences of nuclear war, lest we ever tread down a similar path.

ABC News

As more information becomes available regarding the virus that's caused a public health crisis in the United States, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have urged Americans in hard-hit areas to begin wearing cloth masks to cover their faces.

Unlike medical professionals, who need N95 masks (of which there is a shortage) when treating virus patients, average Americans can wear makeshift cloth masks that block the saliva droplets through which the virus is spread.

Keep reading... Show less
Tom Brenner/Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

Given President Donald Trump's propensity for lying and his administration's constant misinformation regarding the current global pandemic, Americans across the country have become selective about which sources they deem as credible in seeking potentially lifesaving information in the face of a national health crisis.

Iowa's Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, is in stark disagreement with most Americans on whom to trust regarding measures designed to curb the virus.

Iowa is one of a few states that still has yet to issue a stay-at-home order to slow the virus's spread. Reynolds has resisted taking the step despite a unanimous recommendation from the Iowa Board of Medicine to do so.

National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci recently said that all states should institute these orders.

Reynolds's response was...telling.

After calling stay-at-home orders a "divisive issue," the governor said:

"I would say that maybe [Fauci] doesn't have all the information"

Fauci has quickly become one of the most notable figures in the pandemic's response, and one of the few officials in President Donald Trump's virus task force that Americans widely trust to deliver accurate information. He's been an integral part of curbing health crises from the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States to Avian Flu to H1N1 and more.

If Fauci doesn't have all the information, then the country is—for lack of a better word—completely screwed.

People were appalled at the governor's defense.

It's safe to say that Fauci has more information and experience in these situations than any governor in the nation—including Reynolds.

The death toll in the United States from the virus recently surpassed 6000.

Information saves lives. Ignorance endangers them.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

In the face of the global pandemic that's killed over 5000 Americans, President Donald Trump is still expressing reluctance to employ federal powers to assist states hardest hit by the virus.

Among the most urgent of obstacles some governors are facing is a shortage of crucial medical equipment—including ventilators—often needed to treat the highly contagious respiratory virus.

Keep reading... Show less
Mark Makela/Getty Images

The respiratory virus that's ballooned into a global pandemic and brought daily life in the United States to a halt has carried another chilling side effect with it.

Because the virus originated in Wuhan, China, anti-Chinese hysteria has sprouted up across the country. These racist flames have only been stoked by President Donald Trump, whose insistence on calling it "Chinese virus" corresponded with an uptick in hate crimes and harassment of Asian Americans across the across the United States, regardless of their country of origin or ancestry.

Keep reading... Show less
Samuel Corum/Getty Images // SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Even in the face of a national health crisis that threatens hundreds of thousands of American lives, President Donald Trump has consistently signaled that he's incapable of rising to the urgency of the moment, choosing instead to pick fights with governors over Twitter and to brag about the ratings of his press briefings.

That string of behavior continued with a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), which read more like one of the President's Twitter screeds than a letter from the President of the United States.

Keep reading... Show less
U.S. Navy

The internet is flooded with messages of support for Navy Captain Brett Crozier, who commands the 5000 person crew of the Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier that was recently forced to dock in Guam.

Crozier sent a letter to the Navy this week begging for additional supplies and resources to aid the 93 people on the Roosevelt who tested positive for the virus that's become a global pandemic, as well as facilities for the additional 1000 people who need to be quarantined.

Keep reading... Show less