Scientist Used Ladybugs to Prove AC/DC's Mantra That 'Rock N Roll Ain't Noise Pollution' Wrong

A picture taken on July 24, 2018 shows a ladybug on an ear of wheat in a field near the small village of Puchheim, southern Germany. (Photo by Christof STACHE / AFP) (Photo credit should read CHRISTOF STACHE/AFP/Getty Images)

If you’ve got an aphid problem in your garden and depend on ladybugs for eradication, you might do well to turn down your radio. At least, that’s what’s indicated by a July study published in the journal Ecology and Evolution, overturning once and for all AC/DC’s 1980 claim that “rock ‘n’ roll ain’t noise pollution.”

In a unique experiment, researchers at Mississippi State University placed ladybugs and aphid-infested soybean plants in chambers outfitted with computer speakers and an iPhone, which then played everything from rock and country music to folk-punk and just plain industrial sounds like car horns and jackhammers.

While most of the music had no quantifiable effect on the insects, both the rock music and industrial sounds caused them to eat fewer aphids than a control group of insects allowed to eat in silence, even though aphids are one of the black-spotted red beetles’ preferred food sources. To finalize the experiment, the researchers then subjected a group of ladybugs to two weeks’ worth of AC/DC’s 1980 album “Back in Black.”

Why that particular choice?

“The reality is, it started with me listening to AC/DC in my car,” Barton told Earther. “I love AC/DC, and I’ve listened to that album a million times, but I thought about that last song on the album—‘Rock and Roll Ain’t Noise Pollution’—and for some reason it just clicked: that’s a testable hypothesis.”

Sure enough, after two weeks of lead singer’s Brian Johnson’s distinctive vocals, the music-exposed bugs’ plants contained 40 times more aphids than did those in with the control group of ladybugs, who were allowed to eat in silence.

The exact reason why was not determined: “While we found convincing evidence that anthropogenic [or, human-caused] sound can affect lady beetle foraging rates and indirectly affect aphids and plants,” the researchers write, “we also show that this does not occur with all anthropogenic sounds. Our results suggest that volume (i.e., magnitude) is important…. It remains unclear why some treatments (e.g., country music and the band Warblefly) failed to have an effect on predation rates when at the same volume as Back in Black.”

The researchers then dried and weighed the remaining soybean plants, finding that the ones placed with the ladybugs who experienced the noise had suffered “reduced final plant biomass,” raising implications for noise pollution in the commercial agriculture world.

"I don't think that noise pollution itself is going to become a huge threat for farmers and agriculture," lead researcher Barton told the Australian Broadcast Corporation. "But when you add noise pollution in combination with warming temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, [and] slowing winds, all of these things together are probably going to have an impact on the efficiency of natural enemies, pest loads, how much pesticide must be applied and of course crop yield."

Though it might be difficult for farms to reduce the amount of noise from equipment and operations, they at least have an idea of what music not to play while out in the field.


Shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced that representatives would begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took the podium to defend the President and the Republican party as a whole.

It could've gone better.

Keep reading... Show less
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images // MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

One day after the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference announcing that the House would begin drafting articles of impeachment, with a possible floor vote as soon as Christmas.

The press conference signaled the beginning of the end of the impeachment inquiry in the House.

Keep reading... Show less
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee, in its public impeachment hearing against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, consulted four constitutional scholars for greater insight to the legal implications of the President's Ukraine scandal—and whether they merit impeachment.

Three witnesses, called by Democrats, each made compelling arguments for the articles of impeachment with which Trump could be charged.

George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley—invited by Republicans—was the lone dissenter.

Keep reading... Show less
gbuck_jr/Twitter; National Archives

The Republican Party again raised ire and eyebrows with yet another GOP candidate advocating violence against members of Congress in official campaign materials.

This time it is George Buck Jr. of Florida. The GOP politician is running for the 13th congressional district—a seat currently held by Democrat Charlie Crist.

Keep reading... Show less
Win McNamee/Getty Images // Hogan Gidley/Twitter

President Donald Trump's press team is working overtime to discredit media coverage of the impeachment hearings against their boss.

The House Judiciary Committee began its hearings today, with four constitutional scholars—Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Noah Feldman, and Jonathan Turley—tasked with testifying about the constitutionality of impeaching Donald Trump. The former three were invited by Democrats, who hold the majority, while Turley was invited by Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less

The House Intelligence Committee submitted to the House Judiciary Committee its 300 page report of information gleaned from fact witnesses so far in the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

In addition to reiterating the testimony of several witnesses regarding Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine, the report also highlighted call records between numerous key players in the Ukraine scandal.

Keep reading... Show less